« Previous
Next »
Women and Birth
Volume 19, Issue 3
, Pages 79-83
, September 2006
Challenging midwifery care, challenging midwives and challenging the system
References
- . Continuing to care: the organisation of midwifery services in the UK. Hale: Books for Midwives Press; 1998;
- NSW Health Department. Final report of the ministerial task force on obstetric services in NSW: the Shearman Report. State Health Publication No. (HSU) 89-007 ed. Sydney: NSW Department of Health; 1989.
- . Models of maternity service provision. Sydney: NSW Department of Health; 2003;
- NSW Health. A framework for managing the quality of health services in NSW. State Health Publication No. (HPA) 990024 ed. Sydney: NSW Health Department; 2000.
- . Having a baby in Victoria: ministerial review of birthing services in Victoria. Melbourne: Victorian Department of Health; 1990;
- . Ministerial task force to review obstetric, gynaecological and neonatal services in Western Australia. Perth: Health Department of Western Australia; 1990;
- . ReBirthing: report of the review into maternity services in Queensland. Brisbane: Queensland Health; 2005;
- . National Maternity Action Plan for the introduction of community midwifery services in urban and regional Australia. Canberra: Maternity Coalition, AIMS (Australia), Australian Society of Independent Midwives, Community Midwifery WA Inc.; 2002;
- . The ‘Know Your Midwife’ scheme—a randomised trial of continuity of care by a team of midwives. Midwifery. 1989;5(1):11–16
- . Does team midwifery care increase satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care? A randomised controlled trial. Birth. 2000;27(3):156–167
- Kenny P, Brodie P, Eckermann S, Hall J. Westmead hospital team midwifery project evaluation: final report. Sydney, NSW: Westmead Hospital; 1994.
- . Continuity of care by a midwife team versus routine care during pregnancy and birth: a randomised trial. Med J Aust. 1995;163(6):193–289
- Collaboration in maternity care: a randomised controlled trial comparing community-based continuity of care with standard care. Br J Obst Gynaecol. 2001;108(1):16–22
- . Team midwifery in a tertiary level obstetric service: a randomised controlled trial. Birth. 2000;27(3):168–173
- . Team midwife care: maternal and infant outcomes. Aust N Z J Obst Gynaecol. 2001;41(3):257–264
- . Evaluation of one-to-one midwifery: women's responses to care. Birth Issues Perinatal Care Educ. 1998;25(2):73–80
- Sandall J, Davies J, Warwick C. Evaluation of the Albany midwifery practice: final report March 2001. London: King's College; 2001.
- . Midwives’ burnout and continuity of care. Br J Midwifery. 1997;5(2):106–111
- Lester A. The argument for caseload midwifery. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest;15(1):27–30.
- . Midwifery group practice: an evaluation of clinical effectiveness, quality and sustainability. Adelaide: Children, Youth and Women's Health Service, Women's and Children's Hospital; 2005;
- Tracy S, Hartz D, Nicholl M, McCann Y, Latta D. An integrated service network in maternity—the implementation of a midwifery-led unit. Aust Health Rev;29(3):332–9.
- Tracy S, Hartz D. The quality review of ryde midwifery group practice, September 2004 to October 2005: final report. Sydney: Northern Sydney and Central Coast Health; 2005.
- Passant L, Homer C, Wills J. From student to midwife: the experiences of newly graduated midwives working in an innovative model of midwifery care. Aust J Midwifery;16(4):18–21.
- . Community based midwifery program in Fremantle WA. Fremantle: Centre for Research for Women (WA) and the Fremantle Community Midwives; 1997;
- . An evaluation of the northern women's community midwifery program. Adelaide: Department of Human Services; 2002;
- NRHA. National rural health alliance: media release—make every mother and child count in rural and remote Australia; 2005. Available from: http://www.ruralhealth.org.au/nrhapublic/ [cited 6 April 2005].
- NRHA. Communique and key recommendations from the 8th national rural health conference; 2005. Available from: http://www.ruralhealth.org.au/nrhapublic/publicdocs/conferences/8thNRHC/RecsProcess.htm [cited 8 April 2005].
- Brodie P. Addressing the barriers to midwifery: Australian midwives speaking out. J Aust College Midwives;15(3):5–14.
- Leap N, Barclay L, Sheehan A. Results of the Australian midwifery action project education survey. Paper 2: barriers to effective midwifery education as identified by midwifery course coordinators. Aust Midwifery J;16(3):6–11.
- Leap N. Identifying the practice component of Australian midwifery education programs: results of the Australian Midwifery Action Project (AMAP) Education Survey. Aust Midwifery J;15(3):15–23.
- . Review of services offered by midwives. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 1998;
- Duckett S. Health workforce design for the 21st century. Aust Health Rev;29(2):201–10.
- Weaver E, Clark K, Vernon B. Obstetricians and midwives modus vivendi for current times. Med J Aust;182(9):436–7.
- . Future directions for Victoria's maternity services. Melbourne, Victoria: Department of Human Services; 2004;
- Cresswell A. Midwife care gets seal of approval. The Weekend Australian (3/9/05); 2005 [Sect. 9].
- Humphrey M. Editorial. Aust N Z J Obst Gynaecol;46(1):1.
- Homer C. Collaboration in maternity care. A response to ‘what do I think of midwife-led units?’ Aust N Z J Obst Gynaecol;46:262.
PII: S1871-5192(06)00064-3
doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2006.07.002
© 2006 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Women and Birth
Volume 19, Issue 3
, Pages 79-83
, September 2006
