Women and Birth
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 31-34 , March 2007

The effect of professional socialisation on midwives’ practice

  • Myra Parsons

      Affiliations

    • Midwife in private practice, University of Western Sydney, NSW, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Rhonda Griffiths

      Affiliations

    • South West Sydney Centre for Applied Nursing Research, Australia
    • NSW Centre for Evidence Based Health Care, South Western Sydney Area Health Service, Australia
    • Midwife in private practice, University of Western Sydney, NSW, Australia

Received 10 April 2006 ,Revised 23 September 2006 ,Accepted 25 September 2006.

References 

  1. Carr C, Schott A. Differences in evidence-based care in midwifery practice and education. J Nurs Scholarship. 2002;34(2):153–158
  2. Homer C, Brodie P, Leap N. Establishing models of continuity of midwifery care in Australia. Sydney: Centre for Family Health & Midwifery, University Technology Sydney; 2000;
  3. Newnman L. The midwife's role: challenges and changes in the post-medical movement towards woman-centred midwifery care. vol. 14 (4). Australian College of Midwives Inc.; 2001;p. 12–5
  4. Parsons M. Policy or tradition: oral intake in labour. Aust J Midwifery. 2001;14(3):6–12
  5. Parsons M. A midwifery practice dichotomy on oral intake in labour. Midwifery. 2004;20(1):72–81
  6. Humphris D. Implementing research findings in practice. Nursing Standard. 1997;11(33):49–56
  7. Cheek J, Gibson T. Policy matters: critical policy analysis and nursing. J Adv Nurs. 1996;25(4):668–672
  8. Burgum M. Promoting EBP in midwifery. Aust Nurs J. 1997;4(1):22–24
  9. Chamberlain M. Factors affecting the acquisition of skills in midwifery students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. United Kingdom: University of London; 1993.
  10. Hayward RSA, Wilson MC, Tunis SR, Bass EB, Guyatt G. Users’ guides to the medical literature: VIII: how to use clinical practice guidelines: A. Are the recommendations valid?. J Am Med Assoc. 1995;274(7):570–574
  11. Rashidian A, Russell I. Towards better prescribing—a model for implementing clinical guidelines in primary care organisations in the NHS. Clin Governance Int J. 2003;8(1):26–32
  12. Currie SM. Aspects of the preparation of student midwives for autonomous practice. Midwifery. 1999;15:283–292
  13. Stewart M. Whose evidence counts? An exploration of health professionals’ perceptions of evidence-based practice, focusing on the maternity services. Midwifery. 2001;17:279–288
  14. Etuk E. Professionals and accountability: what do they mean in midwifery practice?. Practising Midwife. 2001;4(7):28–30
  15. Mair J. An introduction to legal aspects of nursing practice. In:  Daly J,  Speedy S,  Jackson D editor. Contexts of nursing: an introduction. Sydney: Maclennan & Petty; 2000;p. 117–134
  16. Giddens A. Sociology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 1989;
  17. Merton RK. Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press; 1968;
  18. Carpenter K. The subordination of nurses in health care: towards a social divisions approach. In:  Riska E,  Wegar K editor. Gender, work and medicine. London: Sage; 1993;
  19. Chamberlain M. The clinical education of student midwives. In:  Robinson S,  Thomson AM editor. Midwives, research and childbirth. vol. 4:London: Chapman & Hall; 1996;
  20. Bosanquet A. ‘Stones can make people docile’: reflections of a student midwife on how the hospital environment makes ‘good girls’. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest. 2002;12(3):301–305
  21. Gray M, Smith L. The professional socialization of diploma of higher education in nursing students (Project 2000): a longitudinal qualitative study. J Adv Nurs. 1999;29(3):639–647
  22. Mackay L. Nursing a problem. Milton Keynes: Open University Press; 1989;
  23. Friedman M. Autonomy, social disruption, and women. In:  Mackenzie C,  Stoljar N editor. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000;p. 35–51
  24. Kirkham M. The culture of midwifery in the National Health Service in England. J Adv Nurs. 1999;30:732–739
  25. Farrell GA. From tall poppies to squashed weeds: why don’t nurses pull together more?. J Adv Nurs. 2001;35(1):26–33
  26. Hastie C. Midwifery issues. Birth Issues. 1999;8(3):91
  27. McKenna BG, Smith NA, Poole SJ, Coverdale JH. Horizontal violence: experiences of registered nurses in their first year of practice. J Adv Nurs. 2003;42(1):90–96
  28. Downes D, Rock P. Understanding deviance. 4th ed.. Oxford: Oxford University; 2003;
  29. Roach-Auleu S. Deviance and social control. In:  Jureidini R,  Poole M editor. Sociology: Australian connections. 3rd ed.. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin; 2003;p. 312–338
  30. Hutchinson SA. Responsible subversion: a study of rule-bending among nurses. Scholarly Inquiry Nurs Practice Int J. 1990;4(1):3–17
  31. Christmas J. Autonomy and personal history. Can J Philos. 1991;21(1):1–24

PII: S1871-5192(06)00090-4

doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2006.09.003

Women and Birth
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 31-34 , March 2007