Women and Birth
Volume 19, Issue 4 , Pages 97-105 , December 2006

The influence of the birthplace and models of care on midwifery practice for the management of women in labour

  • Lesa M. Freeman

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 2 9351 0530.
  • ,
  • Vivienne Adair

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand
  • ,
  • Helen Timperley

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Education, The University of Auckland, New Zealand
  • ,
  • Sandra H. West

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Australia

References 

  1. Page LA. Putting science and sensitivity into practice. In:  Page LA editors. The new midwifery: science and sensitivity in practice. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2000;p. 7–44
  2. Crowther C, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, Brown I. Monitoring the progress of labour. In:  Chalmers I,  Enkin MW,  Keirse MJNC editor. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford University Press; 1989;p. 833–845
  3. Studd J. Partograms and monograms of cervical dilatation in management of primigravid labour. Br. Med. J. 1973;4:451–455
  4. Friedman EA. The graphic analysis of labor. Am. J. Obst. Gynecol. 1954;68(6):1568–1575
  5. Walsh D. Management of progress in first stage of labour. Midwives Chronicle and Nursing Notes; March 1994. p. 84–8.
  6. Philpott RH, Castle WM. Cervicographs in the management of labour on primigravidae: the alert line for detecting abnormal labour. J. Obst. Gynaecol. Br. Commonwealth. 1972;79:596–598
  7. Gee H, Sharif K. Management of the first stage of labour. Br. J. Hospital Med. 1994;52(8):395–400
  8. O’Driscoll K, Jackson RJ, Gallagher JT. Prevention of prolonged labour. Br. Med. J. 1969;2:477–480
  9. Bennett A, Etherington W, Hewson D. Childbirth choices. Auckland, New Zealand: Viking Pacific Penguin Books; 1993;
  10. Peaceman AM, Socol ML. Active management of labor. Am. J. Obst. Gynecol. 1996;175:363–368
  11. Rockenschaub A. Technology-free obstetrics at the Semmelweis clinic. Lancet. 1990;335:977–978
  12. Thornton JG. Active management of labour. Br. Med. J. 1996;313:378
  13. Thomson M. Unexplained differences in first stage labor duration in Primiparas at North American and European Hospitals. Birth. 1988;15(4):205–208
  14. Bryar R. Theory for midwifery practice. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: MacMillan Press Ltd.; 1995;
  15. Harding D. Making choices in childbirth. In:  Page LA,  Percival P editor. The new midwifery: science and sensitivity in practice. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2000;p. 71–83
  16. Davis-Floyd R, Mather FS. The technocratic, humanistic and holistic paradigms of childbirth. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest. 2002;4(12):500–506
  17. Barlow Y. Childbirth: management of labour through the ages. Nursing Times. 1994;90(35):41–43
  18. Hunter M. Autonomy, clinical freedom and responsibility. In:  Kirkham M editors. Birth centres: a social model for maternity care. London, UK: Books for Midwives, Elsevier Science Ltd.; 2003;p. 239–248
  19. Walsh D. Part three: assessing women's progress in labour. Br. J. Midwifery. 2000;8(7):449–457
  20. Duff M. Labour behaviours: a journey in assessing labour progress. In: Proceedings of the 5th New Zealand college of midwives conference. Auckland, New Zealand. 1998;
  21. Seibold C, Miller M, Hall J. Midwives and women in partnership: the ideal and the real. Aust. J. Adv. Nursing. 1999;17(2):21–27
  22. Fleming VEM. Women and midwives in partnership: a problematic relationship?. J. Adv. Nursing. 1998;27:8–14
  23. Bailey R, Hinshaw K. Intrapartum fetal surveillance. In:  Damos JR,  Eisinger SH editor. Advanced life support in obstetrics: course syllabus. 4th ed.. KS, USA: American Academy of Family Physicians; 2000;
  24. Wagner M. Pursuing the birth machine: the search for appropriate birth technology. Camperdown, NSW, Australia: ACE Graphics; 1994;
  25. Enkin M, Keirse M, Neilson J, Crowther C, Duley L, Hodnett E, et al. A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. 3rd ed.. NY, USA: Oxford University Press; 2000;
  26. Grant J. Nutrition and hydration in labour. In:  Alexander J,  Levy V,  Roch S editor. Intrapartum care: a research-based approach. Midwifery Practice vol. 2:Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: MacMillan Press Ltd.; 1990;
  27. Roberts J. Maternal position during the first stage of labour. In:  Chalmers I,  Enkin MW,  Keirse MJNC editor. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. UK: Oxford University Press; 1989;p. 883–892
  28. Simkin P, Hara M. Non-pharmacological relief of pain during labor: systematic reviews of five methods. Am. J. Obst. Gynecol. 2002;186(5):5131–5137
  29. Albers LL, Anderson D, Cargin L, Daniels SM, Hunter C, Sedler KD. The relationship of ambulation in labor to operative delivery. J. Nurse Midwifery. 1997;42(1):4–8
  30. Leap N. Being with women in pain: do midwives need to rethink their role?. Br. J. Midwifery. 1997;5(5):263
  31. Leap N. Pain in labour: towards a midwifery perspective. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest. 2000;10(1):49–54
  32. Smythe E. Being safe in childbirth: a hermeneutic interpretation of the narratives of women and practitioners. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University; 1998.

PII: S1871-5192(06)00091-6

doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2006.10.001

Women and Birth
Volume 19, Issue 4 , Pages 97-105 , December 2006