« Previous
Next »
Women and Birth
Volume 22, Issue 1
, Pages 11-16
, March 2009
An evaluation of Midwifery Group Practice: Part II: Women’s satisfaction
References
- . Women as consumers of maternity care: measuring ‘satisfaction’ or ‘dissatisfaction’. Birth. 2008;35(1):73–76
- . Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2004;46(2):212–219
- . Evaluation of satisfaction with midwifery care. Midwifery. 2002;18:260–267
- . Evaluating maternity care: a core set of outcome measures. Birth. 2007;34(2):164–172
- . Changing childbirth: lessons from an Australian survey of 1336 women. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1998;105:143–155
- . Women’s satisfaction with antenatal care in a changing maternity service. Midwifery. 1996;12:198–204
- . Pregnant women’s perceptions of prenatal care. American Journal of Maternal and Child Nursing. 1995;23:132–142
- . Does team midwife care increase satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care? A randomized controlled trial. Birth. 2000;27:156–167
- . Satisfaction with midwife-managed care in different time periods: a randomised controlled trial of 1299 women. Midwifery. 1998;14(2):85–93
- . Continuity of care in maternity services: women’s views of one team midwifery scheme. Midwifery. 2000;16:35–47
- . Continuity of carer: what matters to women? A review of the evidence. Midwifery. 2000;16:186–196
- Randomised, controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed care. Lancet. 1996;348(9022):213–218
- Knowing your midwife during labour. British Journal of Midwifery. 1999;7(8):504–510
- . Satisfaction with Team Midwifery Care for low- and high-risk women: a randomized controlled trial. Birth. 2003;30(1):1–10
- . The 1993 survey of recent mothers: issues in survey design, analysis and influencing policy. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 1997;9(4):265–275
- . Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today. 2004;24:105–112
- . Social research methods. 2nd Ed.. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004;
- NVivo qualitative data analysis software Version 2.0. QSR International Pty Ltd., 2002.
- . Evaluation of one-to-one midwifery: women’s responses to care. Birth. 1998;25(2):73–80
- . The Albany midwifery practice (2). MIDIRS Midwifery Digest. 2002;12(2):261–264
- . Continuity of carer: what does it mean and does it matter to midwives and birthing women?. Canadian Journal of Midwifery Research and Practice. 2005–2006;4(3):10–20
PII: S1871-5192(08)00077-2
doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2008.08.001
© 2008 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Women and Birth
Volume 22, Issue 1
, Pages 11-16
, March 2009
