Women and Birth
Volume 22, Issue 3 , Pages 79-81 , September 2009

Medicare rebates for midwives: An analysis of the 2009/2010 Federal Budget

  • Elizabeth Wilkes

      Affiliations

    • Griffith University, School of Nursing & Midwifery Logan Campus, Meadowbrook, Queensland 4131, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Bruce Teakle

      Affiliations

    • Maternity Coalition, Queensland, Australia
  • ,
  • Jenny Gamble

      Affiliations

    • Griffith University, School of Nursing & Midwifery Logan Campus, Meadowbrook, Queensland 4131, Australia

References 

  1. Commonwealth of Australia. Report of the Maternity Service Review February 2009. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2009. p. 2.
  2. Commonwealth of Australia. Outcome 5-primary care; 2009. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/budget/publishing.nsf/Content/2009-2010_Health_PBS_sup1/$File/Outcome%205%20-%20Primary%20Care.pdf [accessed June 3, 2009, p. 206].
  3. Commonwealth of Australia. Budget papers no. 2. Part 2. Expense measures – health and aging; 2009. http://www.aph.gov.au/budget/2009-10/content/bp2/html/bp2_expense-16.htm [accessed May 27, 2009, p. 284].
  4. The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. House of Representatives (2009) Health Legislation Amendment (Midwives and Nurse Practitioners) Bill. p. 8.
  5. International Confederation of Midwives. Definition of the midwife; 2005. http://www.internationalmidwives.org/Portals/5/Documentation/ICM%20Definition%20of%20the%20Midwife%202005.pdf [accessed June 6, 2009].
  6. Hatem M, Sandall J, Devane D, Soltani H, Gates S. Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women (review). The Cochrane Collaboration (2008). www.thecochranelibrary.com [accessed October 16, 2008].
  7. National Health and Medical Research Council. Options for effective care in childbirth (1996). Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
  8. Homer CS, Davis GK, Brodie PM, Sheehan A, Barclay LM, Wills J, et al. Collaboration in maternity care: a randomised controlled trial comparing community-based continuity of care with standard hospital care. BJOG 2001;108(1):16–22.
  9. Rowley MJ, Hensley MJ, Brinsmead MW, Wlodarczyk J. Continuity of care by a midwife team versus routine care during pregnancy and birth: a randomised trial. Med J Aust. 1995;163(6):289–293
  10. Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council. National Competency Standards for the Midwife. Canberra; 2006.
  11. Teleconference between Maternity Coalition National Executive and Department of Health and Aging Australia (Judy Daniels and Rosemary Bryant), June 2, 2009.
  12. Commonwealth of Australia. Budget papers no. 2. Part 2. Expense measures – health and aging; 2009. http://www.aph.gov.au/budget/2009-10/content/bp2/html/bp2_expense-16.htm [accessed May 27, 2009, p. 2].
  13. Roxon Nicola. Hansard. House of Representatives; June 24, 2009.
  14. Commonwealth of Australia. Report of the Maternity Service Review February 2009. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2009. p. 21.
  15. Australian Health Workforce Ministerial Council. Exposure draft Health Practitioner National Regulation Law; June 12, 2009. p. 47, 56.
  16. Newman LA. Why planned attended homebirth should be more widely supported in Australia. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;458:450–453

PII: S1871-5192(09)00063-8

doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2009.07.001

Women and Birth
Volume 22, Issue 3 , Pages 79-81 , September 2009