Research Article| Volume 26, ISSUE 1, P76-81, March 2013

Pregnancy as public property: The experience of couples following diagnosis of a foetal anomaly



      Pregnant women find themselves subject to comments and questions from people in public areas. Normally, becoming ‘public property’ is considered friendly and is relatively easy for pregnant women to deal with. However, following diagnosis of a foetal anomaly, the experience of being public property can exacerbate the emotional turmoil experienced by couples. Original research question: What is the experience of couples who continue pregnancy following the diagnosis of a foetal anomaly?


      The study used an interpretive design informed by Merleau-Ponty and this paper reports on a subset of findings. Thirty-one interviews with pregnant women and their partners were undertaken following the diagnosis of a serious or lethal foetal anomaly. Women were between 25 and 38 weeks gestation at the time of their first interview. The non-directive interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and the transcripts were thematically analysed.


      A prominent theme that emerged during data analysis was that pregnancy is embodied therefore physically evident and ‘public’. Women found it difficult to deal with being public property when the foetus had a serious or lethal anomaly. Some women avoided social situations; others did not disclose the foetal condition but gave minimal or avoidant answers to minimise distress to themselves and others. The male participants were not visibly pregnant and they could continue life in public without being subject to the public's gaze, but they were very aware and concerned about its impact on their partner.


      The public tend to assume that pregnancy is normal and will produce a healthy baby. This becomes problematic for women who have a foetus with an anomaly. Women use strategies to help them cope with becoming public property during pregnancy. Midwives can play an important role in reducing the negative consequences of a woman becoming public property following the diagnosis of a foetal anomaly.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Whittemore R.
        • Knafl K.
        The integrative review: updated methodology.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005; 52: 546-553
        • Bailey L.
        Gender shows: first-time mothers and embodied selves.
        Gender and Society. 2001; 15: 110-129
        • D’Enbeau S.
        • Buzzanell P.M.
        Caregiving and female embodiment: scrutinizing (professional) female bodies in media, academe, and the neighbourhood bar.
        Women and Language. 2010; 33: 29-52
        • Elvey A.
        The material given: bodies, pregnant bodies and earth.
        Australian Feminist Studies. 2003; 18: 199-209
        • Fox R.
        • Heffernan K.
        • Nicolson P.
        ‘I don’t think it was such an issue back then’: changing experiences of pregnancy across two generations of women in south-east England.
        Gender, Place and Culture. 2009; 16: 553-568
        • Longhurst R.
        ‘Corporeographies’ of pregnancy: ‘bikini babes’.
        Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2000; 18: 453-472
        • Paff Ogle J.P.
        • Tyner K.E.
        • Schofield-Tomschin S.
        Watching over baby: expectant parenthood and the duty to be well.
        Sociological Inquiry. 2011; 81: 285-309
        • Rubin L.
        • Steinberg J.
        Self-objectification and pregnancy: are body functionality dimensions protective?.
        Sex Roles. 2011; 65: 606-618
        • Carter S.K.
        Gender performances during labour and birth in the midwives model of care.
        Gend Issues. 2009; 26: 205-223
        • Popiel J.J.
        Making mothers: the advice genre and the domestic ideal 1760–1830.
        Journal of Family History. 2004; 29: 339-350
        • Bainbridge J.
        Unsolicited advice: a rite of passage through your first pregnancy.
        British Journal of Midwifery. 2006; 14: 265
        • Roush A.
        • Sullivan P.
        • Cooper R.
        • McBride J.W.
        Perinatal hospice.
        Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews. 2007; 7: 216-221
        • Chitty L.S.
        • Barnes C.A.
        • Berry C.
        Continuing with pregnancy after a diagnosis of lethal abnormality: experience of five couples and recommendations for management.
        British Medical Journal. 1996; 313: 478-480
        • Locock L.
        • Crawford J.
        • Crawford J.
        The parents’ journey: continuing a pregnancy after a diagnosis of Patau's syndrome.
        British Medical Journal. 2005; 331: 1186-1189
        • Ramer-Chrastek J.
        • Thygeson M.V.
        A perinatal hospice for an unborn child with a life-limiting condition.
        International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 2005; 11: 274-276
      1. Merleau-Ponty M. Phenomenology of perception [Smith C, Trans.]. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1945/1962.

        • De Witt L.
        • Ploeg J.
        Critical appraisal of rigour in interpretive phenomenological nursing research.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2006; 55: 215-229
        • Lopez K.A.
        • Willis D.G.
        Descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology: their contributions to nursing knowledge.
        Qualitative Health Research. 2004; 14: 726-735
        • Thomas S.P.
        Through the lens of Merleau-Ponty: advancing the phenomenological approach to nursing research.
        Nursing Philosophy. 2005; 6: 63-76
        • Mapp T.
        Understanding phenomenology: the lived experience.
        British Journal of Midwifery. 2008; 16: 308-311
        • Hass L.
        Merleau-Ponty's philosophy.
        Indiana University Press, Bloomington2008
      2. QSR NVivo 7. QSR NVivo 7. 2006.

        • McCreight B.S.
        Perinatal loss: a qualitative study in Northern Ireland.
        Omega: Journal of Death and Dying. 2008; 57: 1-19
        • Davis-Floyd R.
        Windows in space and time: a personal perspective on birth and death.
        Birth. 2003; 30: 272-277
        • Malacrida C.
        Performing motherhood in a disablist world: dilemmas of motherhood, femininity and disability.
        International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 2009; 22: 99-117
        • Johnston D.D.
        • Swanson D.H.
        Invisible mothers: a content analysis of motherhood ideologies and myths in magazines.
        Sex Roles. 2003; 49: 21-33
        • DiPietro J.A.
        • Irizarry R.A.
        • Costigan K.A.
        • Gurewitsch E.D.
        The psychophysiology of the maternal–fetal relationship.
        Psychophysiology. 2004; 41: 510-520
        • Van der Zalm J.
        • Byrne P.
        Seeing baby: women's experience of prenatal ultrasound examination and unexpected fetal diagnosis.
        Journal of Perinatology. 2006; 26: 403-408
        • Dahlen H.
        • Jackson M.
        • Schmied V.
        • Tracy S.
        • Priddis H.
        Birth centres and the national maternity services review: response to consumer demand or compromise?.
        Women and Birth. 2011; 24: 165-172
        • Hildingsson I.
        • Cederlof L.
        • Widen S.
        Fathers’ birth experience in relation to midwifery care.
        Women and Birth. 2011; 24: 129-136
        • Lundqvist A.
        • Nilstun T.
        • Dykes A.
        Both empowered and powerless: mothers’ experiences of professional care when their newborn dies.
        Birth. 2002; 29: 192-199
        • Fenwick J.
        • Jennings B.
        • Downie J.
        • Butt J.
        • Okanaga M.
        Providing perinatal loss care: satisfying and dissatisfying aspects for midwives.
        Women and Birth. 2007; 20: 153-160
        • Lalor J.G.
        • Devane D.
        • Begley C.M.
        Unexpected diagnosis of fetal abnormality: women's encounters with caregivers.
        Birth. 2007; 34: 80-88