Advertisement
Reply to Letter to the Editor| Volume 26, ISSUE 1, e66, March 2013

Response to: “Detection and management of perinatal depression by midwives”

  • Cindy J. Jones
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Griffith Health Institute, Research Centre for Clinical and Community Practice Innovation, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia. Tel.: +61 07 3735 7284; fax: +61 07 3735 3560.
    Affiliations
    Griffith Health Institute, Research Centre for Clinical and Community Practice Innovation, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Debra K. Creedy
    Affiliations
    Griffith Health Institute, Research Centre for Clinical and Community Practice Innovation, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland 4215, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jenny A. Gamble
    Affiliations
    Griffith Health Institute, Research Centre for Clinical and Community Practice Innovation, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland 4215, Australia

    School of Nursing and Midwifery (Logan Campus), Griffith University, University Drive, Meadowbrook, Queensland 4131, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
Published:August 20, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2012.07.003
      Thank you for the opportunity to respond to comments received by the Journal. In response to the Letter to the Editor titled “Detection and management of perinatal depression by midwives”, we will address the following points. Our original conclusion stating “further training is required to ensure midwives’ competency in psychosocial assessment and management of women experiencing antenatal and postpartum depression” is not based solely on the 17.6% of surveyed midwives’ inability to recognise that further mental health assistance was needed for the fictitious test case. Instead, the conclusion is based on the pattern of results reported in the paper:
      • There was a 16% decrease in scores by surveyed midwives identifying depression in the fictitious test case compared with 79.3% in the Buist et al.’s (2006) study.
      • Mean positive and negative depression awareness scores of 5.0 (SD = 1.8) and 1.8 (SD = 1.4) respectively reflected a moderate level of ability by surveyed midwives to (1) recognise depression; (2) identify the need for help; and (3) identify appropriate treatments.
      • A higher proportion of midwives in our study advocated the use of antidepressants and identified it as being useful during pregnancy and postpartum in comparison to midwives participating in the Buist et al. (2006) study. However, there is presently insufficient evidence to demonstrate the efficacy of antidepressant medication in preventing or treating women experiencing perinatal depression.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect