Qualitative assessment of women's experiences with ECV

Published:October 12, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2012.09.001

      Abstract

      For women with unsuccessful ECV, discussions about their mode of delivery should include the benefits and risks of a planned caesarean or vaginal breech birth. However, most obstetric units continue to offer only planned caesarean births when ECVs are unsuccessful despite the proven safety of vaginal breech births in selected patients. Such unit policies can be at variance with a woman's desire and preference for vaginal birth. Thus, a conflict situation arises that could have varying medical, emotional and cultural implications.

      Aim

      To provide a consumer perspective on ECV from women who had an unsuccessful procedure.

      Methodology

      A qualitative study involving focus group discussions with women who had unsuccessful ECV at secondary obstetric facility in Melbourne, Australia.

      Results

      Emergent themes from the focus group discussions were related to emotions associated with the inevitability of a caesarean section for breech, consequences of an unsuccessful ECV and the various activities undertaken by women to induce spontaneous version.

      Conclusion

      A medicalized approach to ECV fell short of women's expectations of care. There is a need to develop strategies that will help women deal with any conflicts occasioned by an unsuccessful ECV.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hofmeyr G.J.
        • Kulier R.
        External cephalic version for breech presentation at term.
        Cochrane Database Systematic Review. 2000; : CD000083
        • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
        ECV and reducing the incidence of breech presentation.
        2001 (Clinical guidelines: No. 20a)
        • Regalia A.L.
        • Curiel P.
        • Natale N.
        • Galuzzi A.
        • Spinelli G.
        • Ghezzi G.V.L.
        • et al.
        Routine use of external cephalic version in three hospitals.
        Birth. 2000; 27: 19-24
        • Natasha N.
        • Christine l.
        • Carolyn R.
        • Brian P A.C.
        Outcome of external cephalic version and breech presentation at term, an audit of deliveries at a sydney tertiary obstetric hospital, 1974–2004.
        Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2006; 85: 1156-1280
        • Hannah M.E.
        • Hannah W.J.
        • Hewson S.A.
        • Hodnett E.D.
        • Saigal S.
        • Willlan A.R.
        Planned caesarean section versus vaginal birth from Breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech trial Collaborative group.
        Lancet. 2000; 356: 1375-1383
        • Raynes-Greenow C.H.
        • Roberts C.L.
        • Barratt A.
        • Brodrick B.
        • Peat B.
        Pregnant women's preferences and knowledge of term breech management in an Australian setting.
        Midwifery. 2003; 20: 181-187
        • Chong E.S.
        • Mongelli MO
        Attitudes of Singapore women toward caesarean and vaginal deliveries.
        International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2003; 80: 189-194
        • Zhang J.
        • Bowes W.A.
        • Fortney J.A.
        Efficacy of external cephalic version: a review.
        Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1993; 82: 306-312
        • Nassar N.
        • Roberts C.
        • Raynes-Greenow C.
        • Barratt A.
        • Peat B.
        Evaluation of a decision aid for women with breech presentation at term: a randomised controlled trial.
        BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2007; 114: 325-333
        • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
        The management of breech presentation.
        2006 (Clinical guidelines: No. 20b)
        • Bewley S.
        • Shennan A.
        Peer review and the term breech trial.
        The Lancet. 2007; 369: 906