Advertisement

Midwifery practice during birth: Ritual companionship

Published:January 15, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.12.003

      Abstract

      Background

      There is an expectation that midwifery practice is woman centred and promotes physiology. In addition, midwives must assess the wellbeing of mother and baby, and monitor the progress of labour. It is important to understand how midwifery actions and interactions influence the birth experience for women.

      Aim

      The aim of this study was to explore midwifery practice during physiological birth from the perspective of both midwives and mothers.

      Method

      A narrative inquiry involving face-to-face in-depth interviews was used to gather data. The participants were 10 midwives and 10 women who had recently attended or experienced an uncomplicated physiological birth. Data was analysed to identify themes occurring across the narratives.

      Findings

      Two types of midwifery practice were identified from the data: rites of passage and rites of protection. Rites of passage were synergistic with women's needs during birth and involved managing distractions and reflecting internal wisdom. Rites of protection involved performing clinical assessments to determine wellbeing and labour progress. These practices could contradict the rites of passage by disrupting aloneness and reinforcing external wisdom.

      Conclusion

      Midwives performed two types of practices which intersected with women's experience of birth in differing and contested ways. Conceptualising the role of the midwife as a ‘ritual companion’ and actions and words as rituals enables a deeper exploration of the values transmitted and reflected by midwifery practice. This study contributes to a discourse about midwifery practice during birth, women's experience of birth, and the influence of the institution on the nature of mother–midwife relationship.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • International Confederation of Midwives
        Philosophy and model of midwifery care.
        2010 (Available from: http://www.internationalmidwives.org/who-we-are/policy-and-practice/code-of-ethics-philosophy-model-midwifery-care/)
        • International Confederation of Midwives
        ICM International definition of the midwife.
        2011 (Available from: http://www.internationalmidwives.org/who-we-are/policy-and-practice/code-of-ethics-philosophy-model-midwifery-care/)
        • World Health Organization
        Pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum and newborn care: a guide for essential practice.
        2nd ed. World Health Organization, Geneva2006
        • International Confederation of Midwives
        Appropriate use of intervention in childbirth.
        2005 (Available from: http://wwwinternationalmidwivesorg/who-we-are/policy-and-practice/icm-position-statements-general/)
        • Cheung W.
        • Ip W.-Y.
        • Chan D.
        Maternal anxiety and feelings of control during labour: a study of Chinese first-time pregnant women.
        Midwifery. 2007; 23: 123-130
        • O’Hare J.
        • Fallon A.
        Women's experience of control in labour and childbirth.
        Br J Midwifery. 2011; 19: 164-169
        • Anderson T.
        Feeling safe enough to let go: the relationship between a woman and her midwife during the second stage of labour.
        in: Kirkham M. The midwife–mother relationship. 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillian, Basingstoke2010: 93-113
        • Moloney S.
        • Gair S.
        Empathy and spiritual care in midwifery practice: contributing to women's enhanced birth experiences.
        Women Birth. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.04.009
        • Waldenstöm U.
        Why do some women change their opinion about childbirth over time?.
        Birth. 2004; 31: 102-107
        • Walsh D.
        An ethnographic study of women's experience of partnership caseload midwifery practice: the professional as friend.
        Midwifery. 1999; 15: 165-176
        • Cronk M.
        The midwife: a professional servant.
        in: Kirkham M. The midwife–mother relationship. 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillian, Basingstoke2010: 55-65
        • Lundgren I.
        • Dahlberg K.
        Midwives’ experience of the encounter with women and their pain during childbirth.
        Midwifery. 2002; 18: 155-164
        • Kennedy H.P.
        • Shannon M.T.
        • Chuahorm U.
        • Kravetz M.K.
        The landscape of caring for women: a narrative study of midwifery Practice.
        J Midwifery Women's Health. 2004; 49: 14-23
        • Cheyney M.
        Reinscribing the birthing body: homebirth as ritual performance.
        Med Anthropol Q. 2011; 25: 519-542
        • Downe S.
        • Simpson L.
        • Trafford K.
        Expert intrapartum maternity care: a meta-synthesis.
        J Adv Nurs. 2006; 57: 127-140
        • Crowther S.
        • Hall J.
        Spirituality and spiritual care in and around childbirth.
        Women Birth. 2015; 28: 173-178
        • Crowther S.
        • Smythe E.
        • Spence D.
        Kairos time at the moment of birth.
        Midwifery. 2015; 31: 451-457
        • Fahy K.M.
        • Parratt J.A.
        Birth territory: a theory for midwifery practice.
        Women Birth. 2006; 19: 45-50
        • MacLellan J.
        The art of midwifery practice: a discourse analysis.
        MIDIRS Midwifery Digest. 2011; 21: 25-31
        • Blix E.
        Avoiding disturbance: midwifery practice in home birth settings in Norway.
        Midwifery. 2011; 27: 687-692
        • Crowther S.
        • Smythe L.
        • Spence D.
        Mood and birth experience.
        Women Birth. 2014; 27: 21-25
        • Eri T.S.
        • Blystad A.
        • Gjengedal E.
        • Blaaka G.
        Negotiating credibility: first-time mothers’ experiences of contact with the labour ward before hospitalisation.
        Midwifery. 2010; 26: e25-e30
        • Leap N.
        The less we do the more we give.
        in: Kirkham M. The midwife–mother relationship. 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillian, Basingstoke2010: 17-36
      1. Reed R, Barnes M, Rowe J. Women's experiences of birth: childbirth as a rite of passage. Int J Childbirth (accepted manuscript).

        • Leamon J.
        Sharing stories: what can we learn from such practice?.
        MIIDIRS Midwifery Digest. 2004; 14: 13-16
        • Carolan M.
        Women's stories of birth: a suitable form of research evidence?.
        Women Birth. 2006; 19: 65-71
        • Polkinghorne D.E.
        Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis.
        Qual Stud Educ. 1995; 8: 5-23
        • Pinnegar S.
        • Daynes J.G.
        Locating narrative inquiry historically.
        in: Clandinin D.J. Handbook of narrative inquiry: mapping a methodology. Sage Publications, London2007: 3-34
        • Clandinin D.J.
        • Connelly F.M.
        Narrative inquiry: experience and story in qualitative research.
        John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco2000
        • Riley T.
        • Hawe P.
        Researching practice: the methodological case for narrative inquiry.
        Health Educ Res. 2005; 20: 226-236
        • Holloway I.
        • Freshwater D.
        Narrative research in nursing.
        Blackwell Publishing, Oxford2005
        • Liamputtong P.
        Qualitative research methods.
        4th ed. Oxford University Press, Melbourne2013
        • Fraser H.
        Doing narrative research.
        Qual Soc Work. 2004; 3: 179-201
        • Rowe J.
        A room of their own: the social landscape of infant sleep.
        Nurs Inq. 2003; 10: 184-192
        • Josselson R.
        The ethical attitude in narrative research: principles and practicalities.
        in: Clandinin D.J. Handbook of narrative inquiry: mapping a methodology. Sage Publications, London2007: 537-566
        • Ballinger C.
        Navigating multiple research identities: reflexivity in discourse analytic research.
        in: Finlay L. Gough B. Reflexivity: a practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford2003: 66-77
        • van Gennep A.
        The rites of passage.
        The University of Chicago Press, Chicago1909/1960
        • Davis-Floyd R.
        Birth as an American rite of passage.
        2nd ed. University of California Press, Berkley2003
        • Homans G.C.
        Anxiety and ritual: the theories of Malinowski and Radcliffe-Brown.
        Am Anthropol. 1941; 43: 164-172
        • Machin D.
        • Scamell M.
        The experience of using ethnography to explore the bio-medical metaphor during labour.
        Midwifery. 1997; 13: 78-84
        • Kitzinger S.
        The politics of birth.
        Elsevier, London2005
        • McCallum C.
        • Reis A.
        Childbirth as ritual in Brazil: young mothers’ experiences.
        Ethnos. 2005; 70: 335-360
        • Seel R.
        Birth rite.
        Health Visit. 1986; 59: 182-184
        • Hunter B.
        Conflicting ideologies as a source of emotion work in midwifery.
        Midwifery. 2004; 20: 261-272
        • Turner V.
        Betwixt and between: the liminal period in rites of passage.
        in: Mahdi L.C. Foster S.F. Little M. Betwixt and between: patterns of masculine and feminine. Open Court Publishing Company, Illinois1987: 3-19
        • Baddock S.
        Physiological changes during labour.
        in: Pairman S. Pincombe J. Thorogood C. Tracy S. Midwifery: preparation for practice. 3rd ed. Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier, Chatswood2015: 607-625
        • The Macquarie Dictionary
        Macquarie essential dictionary.
        5th ed. Macquarie Dictionary Publishers Pty Ltd., Sydney2010
        • Davis-Floyd R.E.
        The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigm of childbirth.
        Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2001; 75: S5-S23
        • Hammond A.
        • Foureur M.
        • Homer C.S.E.
        The hardware and software implications of hospital birth room design: a midwifery perspective.
        Midwifery. 2013; 30: 825-830
        • Cheyne H.
        • Hundley V.
        • Dowdling D.
        • Bland J.M.
        • McNamee P.
        • Greer I.
        • et al.
        Effects of algorithm for diagnosis of active labour: cluster randomised trail.
        Br Med J. 2008; https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a2396
        • Winter C.
        • Duff M.
        The progress of labour: orderly chaos?.
        in: McCourt C. Childbirth, midwifery and concepts of time. Berghahn Books, Oxford2009: 84-103
        • Shepherd A.
        • Cheyne H.
        • Kennedy S.
        • McIntosh C.
        • Styles M.
        • Niven C.
        The purple line as a measure of labour progress: a longitudinal study.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010; 10 (Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/10/54)
        • Hunter L.P.
        A hermeneutic phenomenological analysis of midwives’ ways of knowing during childbirth.
        Midwifery. 2008; 24: 405-415
        • Benner P.
        From novice to expert.
        Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Menly Park1984
        • Douglas M.
        Purity and danger: an analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo.
        Routledge, London1966
        • Leinweber J.
        • Rowe H.J.
        The cost of ‘being with the woman’: secondary traumatic stress in midwifery.
        Midwifery. 2010; 26: 76-87
        • Lahood G.
        Rumour of angels and heavenly midwives: anthropology of transpersonal events and childbirth.
        Women Birth. 2007; 20: 3-10
        • Maude R.
        • Lawson J.
        • Foureur M.
        Auscultation – the action of listening.
        Birthspirit Midwifery J. 2010; 5: 9-17
        • Downe S.
        • McCourt C.
        From being to becoming: reconstructing childbirth knowledge.
        in: Downe S. Normal childbirth: evidence and debate. 2nd ed. Churchill Livingston, London2008: 3-27
        • Ferrazzi E.
        • Milani S.
        • Cirillo F.
        • Livio S.
        • Piola C.
        • Brusati V.
        • et al.
        Progression of cervical dilatation in normal human labor is unpredictable.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1111/acogs.12719
        • Zhang J.
        • Troendle J.
        • Grantz K.L.
        • Reddy U.M.
        Statistical aspects of modeling the labor curve.
        AJOG. 2015; 6: 750.e1-750.e4
        • Downe S.
        • Gyte G.M.L.
        • Dahlen H.G.
        • Singata M.
        Routine vaginal examination for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (Art. No.: CD010088)https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010088.pub2
        • Surtees R.
        ‘Everybody expects the perfect baby… and perfect labour… and so you have to protect yourself’: discourses of defence in midwifery practice in Aotearoa/New Zealand.
        Nurs Inq. 2010; 17: 81-91
        • Hilder L.
        • Zhichao Z.
        • Parker M.
        • Jahan S.
        • Chambers G.M.
        Australia's mothers and babies 2012. Perinatal statistics series no. 30. Cat. no. PER 69.
        AIHW, Canberra2014