Advertisement

Mobile applications providing guidance about decreased fetal movement: Review and content analysis

Published:August 20, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.020

      Abstract

      Background

      Maternal perception of decreased fetal movement has clinical significance as a predictor of pregnancies at risk of adverse outcomes, including stillbirth. Increasingly, women are using mobile applications (“apps”) to access information during the antenatal period. Little is known about how apps intended for use during pregnancy guide women to address fetal movement concerns.

      Objective

      To explore information about decreased fetal movement provided through mobile apps intended for use during pregnancy.

      Methods

      A systematic review framework was applied to the search, screening, and assessment of mobile apps. A sample of apps were downloaded in December 2016 that met inclusion criteria for accessibility, reach, relevance and quality. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers in January 2017. A quantitative and qualitative approach was taken to analyse data and present results.

      Findings

      All 24 apps in the sample mentioned decreased fetal movement, but few explicitly link decreased fetal movement to stillbirth or other specific adverse outcomes. There is substantial variability in guidance for fetal movement monitoring. One-quarter of apps recommend consumption of food or drink to stimulate fetal movement, two-thirds of apps recommend “kick counting”, and one-third offer a kick “counter”.

      Conclusion

      This review is the first to assess information about decreased fetal movement available in mobile apps intended for download by pregnant women. Across the sample, this review identifies a lack of evidence-based clinical advice to guide women experiencing decreased fetal movement. As an antenatal education tool used by millions of women, accurate content about fetal movement is essential.

      Abbreviations:

      Apps (Mobile applications), DFM (Decreased fetal movement), iOS (A mobile operating system created and developed by Apple Inc. exclusively for its hardware), NHMRC (National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)), PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses), PSANZ (Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand)

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Frøen J.F.
        • Heazell A.E.
        • Tveit J.V.
        • Saastad E.
        • Fretts R.C.
        • Flenady V.
        Fetal movement assessment.
        Semin Perinatol. 2008; 32: 243-246
        • Dutton P.J.
        • Warrander L.K.
        • Roberts S.A.
        • Bernatavicius G.
        • Byrd L.M.
        • Gaze D.
        • et al.
        Predictors of poor perinatal outcome following maternal perception of reduced fetal movements — a prospective cohort study.
        PloS One. 2012; 7 (e39784)
        • Warrander L.K.
        • Batra G.
        • Bernatavicius G.
        • Greenwood S.L.
        • Dutton P.
        • Jones R.L.
        • et al.
        Maternal perception of reduced fetal movements is associated with altered placental structure and function.
        PloS One. 2012; 7 (e34851)
        • Stacey T.
        • Thompson J.M.
        • Mitchell E.A.
        • Ekeroma A.
        • Zuccollo J.
        • McCowan L.M.
        Maternal perception of fetal activity and late stillbirth risk: findings from the Auckland Stillbirth Study.
        Birth. 2011; 38: 311-316
        • Tveit J.V.
        • Saastad E.
        • Stray-Pedersen B.
        • Bordahl P.E.
        • Frøen J.F.
        Concerns for decreased foetal movements in uncomplicated pregnancies — increased risk of foetal growth restriction and stillbirth among women being overweight, advanced age or smoking.
        J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 23: 1129-1135
        • O’Sullivan O.
        • Stephen G.
        • Martindale E.
        • Heazell A.E.
        Predicting poor perinatal outcome in women who present with decreased fetal movements.
        J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 29: 705-710
        • Frøen J.F.
        A kick from within — fetal movement counting and the cancelled progress in antenatal care.
        J Perinat Med. 2004; 32: 13-24
        • Frøen J.F.
        • Tveit J.V.
        • Saastad E.
        • Bordahl P.E.
        • Stray-Pedersen B.
        • Heazell A.E.
        • et al.
        Management of decreased fetal movements.
        Semin Perinatol. 2008; 32: 307-311
        • Flenady V.
        • Frøen F.
        • MacPhail J.
        • Gilshenan K.
        • Mahomed K.
        • Gardener G.
        • et al.
        Maternal perception of decreased fetal movements for the detection of the fetus at risk: the Australian experience of the international FEMINA collaboration.
        in: International Stillbirth Alliance (ISA) conference, Oslo, Norway2008
        • Berndl A.M.
        • O’Connell C.M.
        • McLeod N.L.
        Fetal movement monitoring: how are we doing as educators?.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013; 35: 22-28
        • Tveit J.V.
        • Saastad E.
        • Stray-Pedersen B.
        • Bordahl P.E.
        • Flenady V.
        • Fretts R.
        • et al.
        Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines — a clinical quality improvement.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009; 9: 32
        • Saastad E.
        • Tveit J.V.
        • Flenady V.
        • Stray-Pedersen B.
        • Fretts R.
        • Bordahl P.E.
        • et al.
        Implementation of uniform information on fetal movement in a Norwegian population reduces delayed reporting of decreased fetal movement and stillbirths in primiparous women − a clinical quality improvement.
        BMC Res Notes. 2010; 3: 2
        • Saastad E.
        • Winje B.A.
        • Stray Pedersen B.
        • Frøen J.F.
        Fetal movement counting improved identification of fetal growth restriction and perinatal outcomes — a multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial.
        PloS One. 2011; 6 (e28482)
        • Winje B.A.
        • Saastad E.
        • Gunnes N.
        • Tveit J.V.
        • Stray-Pedersen B.
        • Flenady V.
        • et al.
        Analysis of ‘count-to-ten’ fetal movement charts: a prospective cohort study.
        BJOG. 2011; 118: 1229-1238
        • Radestad I.
        • Lindgren H.
        Women’s perceptions of fetal movements in full-term pregnancy.
        Sex Reprod Healthc. 2012; 3: 113-116
        • Winje B.A.
        • Wojcieszek A.M.
        • Gonzalez-Angulo L.Y.
        • Teoh Z.
        • Norman J.
        • Frøen J.F.
        • et al.
        Interventions to enhance maternal awareness of decreased fetal movement: a systematic review.
        BJOG. 2015; 123: 886-898
        • Mangesi L.
        • Hofmeyr G.J.
        • Smith V.
        • Smyth R.M.
        Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 10 (Cd004909)
        • Daly L.M.
        • Gardener G.
        • Bowring V.
        • Burton W.
        • Chadha Y.
        • Ellwood D.
        • et al.
        Care of pregnant women with decreased fetal movements: update of a clinical practice guideline for Australia and New Zealand.
        Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 58: 463-468
      1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Reduced Fetal Movements, Green-top Guideline No. 57. U.K.; 2011.

        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
        Practice bulletin no. 145: antepartum fetal surveillance.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124: 182-192
        • Asiodu I.V.
        • Waters C.M.
        • Dailey D.E.
        • Lee K.A.
        • Lyndon A.
        Breastfeeding and use of social media among first-time African American mothers.
        J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015; 44: 268-278
        • O’Higgins A.
        • Murphy O.C.
        • Egan A.
        • Mullaney L.
        • Sheehan S.
        • Turner M.J.
        The use of digital media by women using the maternity services in a developed country.
        Ir Med J. 2014; 107: 313-315
        • Thomas G.M.
        • Lupton D.
        Threats and thrills: pregnancy apps, risk and consumption.
        Health Risk Soc. 2016; 17: 495-509
        • Lee Y.
        • Moon M.
        Utilization and content evaluation of mobile applications for pregnancy, birth, and child care.
        Healthc Inform Res. 2016; 22: 73-80
      2. research2guidance. mHealth App Economics 2017: Current Status and Future Trends in Mobile Health. Berlin, Germany, 2017.

        • Lupton D.
        • Pedersen S.
        An Australian survey of women’s use of pregnancy and parenting apps.
        Women Birth. 2016; 29: 368-375
        • Tripp N.
        • Hainey K.
        • Liu A.
        • Poulton A.
        • Peek M.
        • Kim J.
        • et al.
        An emerging model of maternity care: smartphone, midwife, doctor?.
        Women Birth. 2014; 27: 64-67
        • Daly L.M.
        • Horey D.
        • Middleton P.F.
        • Boyle F.M.
        • Flenady V.
        The effect of mobile application interventions on influencing healthy maternal behaviour and improving perinatal health outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
        Syst Rev. 2017; 6 (p26)
        • Daly L.M.
        • Horey D.
        • Middleton P.F.
        • Boyle F.M.
        • Flenady V.
        The Effect of Mobile App Interventions on Influencing Healthy Maternal Behavior and Improving Perinatal Health Outcomes: Systematic Review.
        JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2018; 6: e10012
        • Robinson F.
        • Jones C.
        Women’s engagement with mobile device applications in pregnancy and childbirth.
        Pract Midwife. 2014; 17: 23-25
        • BinDhim N.F.
        • Hawkey A.
        • Trevena L.
        A systematic review of quality assessment methods for smartphone health apps.
        Telemed J E Health. 2015; 21: 97-104
        • Mangone E.R.
        • Lebrun V.
        • Muessig K.E.
        Mobile phone apps for the prevention of unintended pregnancy: a systematic review and content analysis.
        JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2016; 4 (e6)
        • Mendiola M.F.
        • Kalnicki M.
        • Lindenauer S.
        Valuable features in mobile health apps for patients and consumers: content analysis of apps and user ratings.
        JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2015; 3: e40
      3. QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo 11 Pro for Windows. Version 11.4.1.1064, 2015 ed.

        • Moher D.
        • Liberati A.
        • Tetzlaff J.
        • Altman D.G.
        • The Prisma Group
        Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
        PLoS Med. 2009; 6e1000097
        • Michaan N.
        • Baruch Y.
        • Topilsky M.
        • Amzalag S.
        • Iaskov I.
        • Many A.
        • et al.
        The effect of glucose administration on perceived fetal movements in women with decreased fetal movement, a double-blinded placebo-controlled trial.
        J Perinatol. 2016; 36: 598-600
        • Janz N.K.
        • Becker M.H.
        The health belief model: a decade later.
        Health Educ Q. 1984; 11: 1-47
        • Prentice-Dunn S.
        • Rogers R.W.
        Protection motivation theory and preventive health: beyond the health belief model.
        Health Educ Res. 1986; 1: 153-161
        • Warland J.
        • Glover P.
        Talking to pregnant women about stillbirth.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15 (A12)
        • Boudreaux E.D.
        • Waring M.E.
        • Hayes R.B.
        • Sadasivam R.S.
        • Mullen S.
        • Pagoto S.
        Evaluating and selecting mobile health apps: strategies for healthcare providers and healthcare organizations.
        Transl Behav Med. 2014; 4: 363-371
      4. Appiness App Review Service. 2018. http://appiness.io/#price. [Accessed 12 February 2018]. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6xBgye7uo).

        • Jake-Schoffman D.E.
        • Silfee V.J.
        • Waring M.E.
        • Boudreaux E.D.
        • Sadasivam R.S.
        • Mullen S.P.
        • et al.
        Methods for evaluating the content, usability, and efficacy of commercial mobile health apps.
        JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2017; 5 (e190)
        • Stoyanov S.R.
        • Hides L.
        • Kavanagh D.J.
        • Zelenko O.
        • Tjondronegoro D.
        • Mani M.
        Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps.
        JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2015; 3: e27