Advertisement
Letter| Volume 33, ISSUE 6, e574-e575, November 2020

Mobile applications for fetal movement: Only decreased movement matters?

Published:February 07, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.02.002
      Maternally perceived fetal movement has long been a study target of midwifery. Indeed, midwives usually perform “first touch” to pregnant women concerning fetal movement.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Daly L.M.
        • Boyle F.M.
        • Gibbons K.
        • Le H.
        • Roberts J.
        • Flenady V.
        Mobile applications providing guidance about decreased fetal movement: review and content analysis.
        Women Birth. 2019; 32 (Jun): e289-e296
        • Bradford B.
        • Maude R.
        Maternal perception of fetal movements in the third trimester: a qualitative description.
        Women Birth. 2018; 31 (Oct): e287-e293
        • Heazell AEP Budd J.
        • Li M.
        • Cronin R.
        • Bradford B.
        • McCowan L.M.E.
        • et al.
        Alterations in maternally perceived fetal movement and their association with late stillbirth: findings from the Midland and North of England stillbirth case-control study.
        BMJ Open. 2018; 8 (Jul)e020031
        • Kuwata T.
        • Matsubara S.
        • Ohkusa T.
        • Ohkuchi A.
        • Izumi A.
        • Watanabe T.
        • et al.
        Establishing a reference value for the frequency of fetal movements using modified’ count to 10’ method.
        J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2008; 34 (Jun): 318-323
        • Whitehead C.L.
        • Cohen N.
        • Visser G.H.A.
        • Farine D.
        Are increased fetal movements always reassuring?.
        J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2019; 22 ([ahead of printing] Feb): 1-6https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1582027
        • Takahashi H.
        • Matsubara T.
        • Horie K.
        • Kobayashi A.
        • Furukawa R.
        • Matsubara S.
        Fetal seizure: a video recording and possible etiology.
        J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2019; ([ahead of printing] Jun 7)https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14016
        • Osiovich H.
        • Barrington K.
        Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of seizures.
        Am. J. Perinatol. 1996; 13 (Nov): 499-501
        • McNally M.A.
        • Johnson J.
        • Huisman T.A.
        • Poretti A.
        • Baranano K.W.
        • Baschat A.A.
        • et al.
        SCN8A epileptic encephalopathy: detection of fetal seizures guides multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment.
        Pediatr. Neurol. 2016; 64 (Nov): 87-91

      Linked Article