Advertisement

The future of the Australian midwifery workforce – impacts of ageing and workforce exit on the number of registered midwives

      Abstract

      Problem

      Ensuring an adequate supply of the midwife workforce will be essential to meet the future demands for maternity care within Australia.

      Background

      Aim: To project the overall number of midwives registered with the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia and the timing of their retirement to 2043 based upon the ageing of the population.
      Methods: Using data on the number of registered midwives released by the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia we calculated the five-year cumulative attrition rate of each five-year age group. This attrition rate was then utilized to estimate the number of midwives registered in each five-year time period from 2018 to 2043. We then estimated the number of midwives that would be registered after also accounting for stated retirement intentions.

      Findings

      Between 2018 and 2023 the overall number of registered midwives will decline from 28,087 to 26,642. After this time there is expected to be growth in the total number, reaching 28,392 in 2028 and 55,747 in 2043. If midwives did relinquish their registration at a rate indicated in previous workforce satisfaction surveys, the overall number of registered midwives would decline to 19,422 in 2023, and remain below 2018 levels until 2038.

      Discussion

      Due to the age distribution of the current registered midwifery workforce the imminent retirement of a large proportion of the workforce will see a decline in the number of registered midwives in the coming years. Additional retirement due to workforce dis-satisfaction may exacerbate this shortfall.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Campbell O.M.R.
        • Graham E.H.
        Maternal Health. An executive summary for the Lancet series.
        Lancet. 2016; 388: 2-8
        • Koblinsky M.
        • et al.
        Quality maternity care for every woman, everywhere: a call to action.
        Lancet. 2016; 388: 2307-2320
        • McLachlan H.
        • et al.
        Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial.
        BJOG. 2012; 119: 1483-1492
        • Boerma T.
        • et al.
        Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.
        Lancet. 2018; 392: 1341-1348
        • Allen J.
        • et al.
        The impact of caseload midwifery, compared with standard care, on women’s perceptions of antenatal care quality: survey results from the [email protected] randomized controlled trial for women of any risk.
        Birth. 2019; 43: 439-449
        • Sandall J.
        • et al.
        Midwife‐led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.
        Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016;
        • Tracy S.K.
        • et al.
        Caseload midwifery compared to standard or private obstetric care for first time mothers in a public teaching hospital in Australia: a cross sectional study of cost and birth outcomes.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 46
        • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
        Ageing societies.
        OECD Factbook 2008. OECD, Paris2008
        • Australian Bureau of Statistics
        Employed Persons by Age and Industry Division of Main Job (ANZSIC).
        ABS, Canberra1984 (onwards. ABS Cat. No. 6291.0.55.003 - EQ12 2019, November)
        • Schofield D.J.
        • Beard J.R.
        Baby boomer doctors and nurses: demographic change and transitions to retirement.
        Med. J. Aust. 2005; 184: 80-83
        • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
        Medical Labour Force 2002.
        AIHW, Canberra2004
        • Department of Health
        Australia’s Future Health Workforce - Doctors Report.
        Australian Government, Canberra2018
        • Department of Health
        Australia’s Future Health Workforce - Nurses Report.
        Australian Government, Canberra2018
        • Joyce C.M.
        • McNeil J.J.
        • Stoelwinder J.U.
        More doctors, but not enough: Australian medical workforce supply 2001-2012.
        Med. J. Aust. 2006; 184: 441-446
        • ABC News
        States Say More Medical Training Places Needed.
        (ABC Online)2006
        • Health Workforce Australia
        Health Workforce 2025: Doctors, Nurses and Midwives Volume 1.
        Health Workforce Australia, Adelaide2012
        • Department of Health
        Midwives NHWDS 2017 Fact Sheet.
        Australian Government, Canberra2018
        • Pugh J.D.
        • et al.
        Western Australia facing critical losses in its midwifery workforce: a survey of midwives’ intentions.
        Midwifery. 2013; 29: 497-505
        • Harvie K.
        • Sidebotham M.
        • Fenwick J.
        Australian midwives’ intentions to leave the profession and the reasons why.
        Women Birth. 2019; 32: e584-e593
        • Keep E.
        Youth Transitions, the Labour Market and Entry Into Employment: Some Reflections and Questions.
        (SKOPE Research Paper No. 108 May 2012) University of Oxford, Oxford2012
        • Department of Social Services
        Age Pension.
        ([cited 2019 13 August]; Available from:)2019
        • World Health Organization
        Midwives’ Voices Midwives’ Realities.
        World Health Organization, Geneva2016
        • Royal College of Midwives
        Why Midwives Leave–revisited.
        Royal College of Midwives, London2016
        • Hunter B.
        • et al.
        Work, Health and Emotional Lives of Midwives in the United Kingdom: the UK WHELM Study.
        Royal College of Midwives, London2017
        • Renfrew M.J.
        • et al.
        Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care.
        Lancet. 2014; 384: 1129-1145
        • Dixon L.
        • et al.
        The emotional wellbeing of New Zealand midwives: comparing responses for midwives in caseloading and shift work settings.
        N. Z. Coll. Midwives J. 2017;
        • Fenwick J.
        • et al.
        The emotional and professional wellbeing of Australian midwives: a comparison between those providing continuity of midwifery care and those not providing continuity.
        Women Birth. 2018; 31: 38-43
        • Dawson K.
        • et al.
        Comparing caseload and non-caseload midwives’ burnout levels and professional attitudes: a national, cross-sectional survey of Australian midwives working in the public maternity system.
        Midwifery. 2018; 63: 60-67
        • Dawson K.
        • et al.
        Caseload midwifery in Australia: what access do women have?.
        Women Birth. 2015; 28: S12
        • Ward D.
        Know your midwife: continuity of midwifery care in a private hospital.
        in: Australian College of Midwives State Conference Queensland, Brisbane2017
        • Toohill J.
        • Chadha Y.
        • Nowlan S.
        An interactive decision making framework (i-DMF) to scale up maternity continuity of carer models.
        J. Nurs. Res. 2019; (in press)
        • Department of Health
        Australia’s Future Health Workforce – Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
        Australian Government, Canberra2018
        • Yates K.
        Dual degree destinations: nursing or midwifery?.
        Women Birth. 2017; 30: 23
        • Cullen D.
        • et al.
        Young student’s motivations to choose an undergraduate midwifery program.
        Women Birth. 2016; 29: 234-239
        • Love B.
        • et al.
        “Unscrambling what’s in your head”: a mixed method evaluation of clinical supervision for midwives.
        Women Birth. 2017; 30: 271-281
        • Australian Institute of Health & Welfare
        Mothers and Babies, 2002.
        AIHW, Canberra2004
        • Australian Institute of Health & Welfare
        Mothers and babies, 2017.
        AIHW, Canberra2019
        • Abhayaratna J.
        • et al.
        Part Time Employment: the Australian Experience.
        Productivity Commission, Canberra2008