Preparing midwifery students to consult confidently

Published:February 12, 2020DOI:
      New graduate midwives can be challenged and lack confidence when engaging in interprofessional collaboration and conversations.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Patterson J.
        • Macznik A.K.
        • Miller S.
        • Kerkin B.
        • Baddock S.
        Becoming a midwife: a survey study of midwifery alumni.
        Women Birth. 2019; 32: e399-e408
        • Miller S.
        • Dahlen H.G.
        Working in collaboration.
        in: Pairman S. Tracy S.K. Dahlen H.G. Dixon L. Midwifery Preparation for Practice. 4th ed. Elsevier, Australia2019: 334-346
        • Kitson-Reynolds E.
        • Ferns P.
        • Trenerry A.
        Transition to midwifery: collaborative working between university and maternity services.
        Br. J. Midwifery. 2015; 23: 510-515
      1. Midwifery Council of New Zealand.
        • Ministry of Health
        Guidelines for Consultation with Obstetric and Related Medical Services (Referral Guidelines).
        • Walsh D.
        • Gamble J.
        ‘Multidisciplinary collaboration’ and ‘team work’: misnomers for subjugation?.
        Aust. Midwifery. 2005; 18: 7-8
        • Munro S.
        • Kornelsen J.
        • Grzybowski S.
        Models of maternity care in rural environments: barriers and attributes of interprofessional collaboration with midwives.
        Midwifery. 2013; 29: 646-652
        • Reason J.
        Human Error.
        Cambridge University Press, New York1994
        • Alvarez G.
        • Coiera E.
        Interdisciplinary communication: an uncharted source of medical error?.
        J. Crit. Care. 2006; 21: 236-242
        • Stein L.
        The doctor-nurse game.
        JAMA Psychiatry. 1967; 16: 699-703
        • Stein L.I.
        • Watts D.T.
        • Howell T.
        The doctor-nurse game revisited.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 1990; 322: 546-549
        • Holyoake D.-D.
        Is the doctor-nurse game still being played?.
        Nurs. Times. 2011; 107: 12-14
        • Hastie C.
        • Fahy K.
        Inter-professional collaboration in delivery suite: a qualitative study.
        Women Birth. 2011; 24: 72-79
        • Leonard M.
        • Graham S.
        • Bonacum D.
        The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care.
        Qual. Saf. Health Care. 2004; 13: i85-i90
        • Posthumus A.G.
        • Schölmerich V.L.N.
        • Waelput A.J.M.
        • et al.
        Bridging between professionals in perinatal care: towards shared care in the Netherlands.
        Matern. Child Health J. 2013; 17: 1981-1989
        • Siassakos D.
        • Draycott T.
        • Crofts J.
        • Hunt L.
        • Winter C.
        • Fox R.
        More to teamwork than knowledge, skill and attitude.
        BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2010; 117: 1262-1269
        • Iliadi P.
        Accountability and collaborative care: how interprofessional education promotes them.
        Health Sci. J. 2010; 4: 129-135
        • Kazumi I.
        • Yukiko N.
        • Naomi K.
        Study on collaboration of midwives with obstetricians: with special focus on midwifery autonomy.
        J. Jpn. Acad. Midwifery. 2013; 27: 60-71
        • Meffe F.
        • Claire Moravac C.
        • Espin S.
        An interprofessional education pilot program in maternity care: findings from an exploratory case study of undergraduate students.
        J. Interprof. Care. 2012; 26: 183-188
        • Power A.
        Interprofessional education: shared learning for collaborative, high-quality care.
        Br. J. Midwifery. 2019; 27: 128-129
        • Anderson G.
        • Hughes C.
        • Patterson D.
        • Costa J.
        Enhancing inter-professional education through low-fidelity simulation.
        Br. J. Midwifery. 2017; 25: 52-58
        • Hood K.
        • Cant R.
        • Baulch J.
        • et al.
        Prior experience of interprofessional learning enhances undergraduate nursing and healthcare students’ professional identity and attitudes to teamwork.
        Nurse Educ. Pract. 2014; 14: 117-122
        • Pollard K.C.
        Non-formal learning and interprofessional collaboration in health and social care: the influence of the quality of staff interaction on student learning about collaborative behaviour in practice placements.
        Learn. Health Soc. Care. 2008; 7: 12-26
        • Shaw B.
        Collaborative working within community maternity services—is this the chink in the armour?.
        Br. J. Midwifery. 2013; 21: 285-291
        • Coffey F.
        Learning by simulation - is it a useful tool for midwifery education?.
        N. Z. Coll. Midwives J. 2015; 51: 30-36
        • Lees S.
        • Phimister D.
        • Broughan C.
        • Dignon Ae
        • Brown M.
        Domestic violence: the base of the iceberg.
        Br. J. Midwifery. 2013; 21: 493-498
        • Warland J.
        • Smith M.
        Using online roleplay in undergraduate midwifery education: a case-study.
        Nurse Educ. Pract. 2012; 12: 279-283
        • Sidebotham M.
        • Jomeen J.
        • Gamble J.
        Teaching evidence based practice and research through blended learning to undergraduate midwifery students from a practice based perspective.
        Nurse Educ. Pract. 2014; 14: 220-224
        • Lewis D.
        • O’Boyle-Duggan M.
        • Chapman J.
        • Dee P.
        • Sellner K.
        • Gorman S.
        ‘Putting Words into Action’ project: using role play in skills training.
        Br. J. Nurs. 2013; 22: 638-644
        • Williams V.
        Completing a maternal acute illness management course as part of the pre-registration programme.
        Br. J. Midwifery. 2017; 25: 144-146
        • Shaw-Battista J.
        • Belew C.
        • Anderson D.
        • Schaik S.
        Successes and challenges of interprofessional physiologic birth and obstetric emergency simulations in a nurse-midwifery education program.
        J. Midwifery Womens Health. 2015; 60: 735-743
        • Škodová Z.
        Communication and interpersonal skills enhancement in midwifery: review.
        Cent. Eur. J. Nurs. Midwifery. 2016; 7: 504-510
        • de la Croix A.
        • Skelton J.
        The reality of role-play: interruptions and amount of talk in simulated consultations.
        Med. Educ. 2009; 43: 695-703
        • Tversky A.
        • Kahneman D.
        Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases.
        Science, New Series. 1974; 185: 1124-1131
        • Robson D.
        The Intelligence Trap. Why Smart People Do Stupid Things and How to Make Wiser Decisions.
        Hodder & Stoughton Ltd., London UK2019
        • Supper I.
        • Catala O.
        • Lustman M.
        • Chemla C.
        • Bourgueil Y.
        • Letrilliart L.
        Interprofessional collaboration in primary health care: a review of facilitators and barriers perceived by involved actors.
        J. Public Health (Bangkok). 2015; 37: 716-727
        • Guraya S.Y.
        • Barr H.
        The effectiveness of interprofessional education in healthcare: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2018; 34: 160-165
        • Freeth D.
        • Reeves S.
        Learning to work together: using the presage, process, product (3P) model to highlight decisions and possibilities.
        J. Interprof. Care. 2004; 18: 43-56
        • Murray-Davis B.
        • Marshall M.
        • Gordon F.
        What do midwives think about interprofessional working and learning?.
        Midwifery. 2011; 27: 376-381
        • Johnson D.W.
        • Johnson R.T.
        • Smith K.A.
        Constructive controversy.Change.
        Change. 2000; 32: 28-37
        • Midwives. NZCo
        Joint Advisory: New Zealand College of Midwives and MERAS: Conflict Resolution.
        • Marshall S.H.
        • J. Flanagan B.
        The evaluation of struvtured communication tools in healthcare.
        Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting. 2008; : 860-864
        • Bulle B.
        • Ford J.
        • Gellman C.
        • Farrell T.
        “Communication in an emergency”: using ISBAR to enhance a structured approach in MeL—a maternity e-learning program.
        Women Birth. 2011; 24: S36
        • Hunter M.
        • Crowther S.
        • McAra-Couper J.
        • Gilkison A.
        • MacGregor D.
        • Gunn J.
        Generosity of spirit sustains caseloading lead maternity carer midwives in New Zealand.
        N. Z. Coll. Midwives J. 2016; 52: 50-55