Advertisement

Paving the way for successful twinning:

Using grounded theory to understand the contribution of twin pairs in twinning collaborations
Published:February 21, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.01.013

      Abstract

      Background

      Twinning collaborations, where two groups — from educational institutions, hospitals or towns — work together cross-culturally on joint goals, are increasingly common worldwide. Pairing up individuals, so-called twin pairs, is thought to contribute to successful collaboration in twinning projects, but as yet, there is no empirical evidence or theory that offers insight into the value of the pair relationship for twinning.

      Aim

      To explore the contribution of one-to-one relationships between twins to twinning projects, as exemplified in projects between Dutch and Moroccan, and Dutch and Sierra Leone midwives.

      Methods

      We conducted thirteen in-depth interviews with midwives from two twinning collaborations. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using an iterative, grounded theory process, yielding a theoretical understanding of one-to-one twinning relationships for twinning collaborations.

      Findings

      Participant comments fell into four substantive categories: 1) Being named a twin, 2) moving beyond culture to the personal level, 3) searching for common ground to engage, 4) going above and beyond the twinning collaboration. Their interplay demonstrates the value of twin pairs in paving the way for successful twinning.

      Discussion

      A complex combination of contextual inequities, personality, and cultural differences affect the twin relationship. Trusting relationships promote effective collaboration, however, as ‘trust’ cannot be mandated, it must be built by coaching twins in personal flexibility and (cultural) communication.

      Conclusion

      By offering original insights into the ways twinning relationships are built, our research explores how twin pairs can enhance the success of twinning projects.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • UNFPA
        The State of the World’s Midwifery, A Universal Pathway. A Woman’s Right to Health.
        ([updated 2014]. Available from:) UNFPA, ICM, WHO, New York2014
        • WHO
        WHO Recommendations: Intrapartum Care for a Positive Childbirth Experience.
        WHO, Geneva2018
        • ICM, WRA
        Midwives’ Voices, Midwives’ Realities.
        WHO, Geneva2016
        • WHO
        World Health Organization. Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health 2016–2030.
        WHO, Geneva2015
        • ten Hoope-Bender P.
        • de Bernis L.
        • Campbell J.
        • Downe S.
        • Fauveau V.
        • Fogstad H.
        • et al.
        Improvement of maternal and newborn health through midwifery.
        Lancet. 2014; 384: 1226-1235https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60930-2
        • Renfrew M.J.
        • McFadden A.
        • Bastos M.H.
        • Campbell J.
        • Channon A.A.
        • Cheung N.F.
        Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care.
        Lancet. 2014; 384https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3
        • Mwaniki M.K.
        Quality in provision of maternity services: the missing link in health-care investments in LMICs?.
        Lancet Glob. Health. 2016; 4: e769-e770
        • Renfrew M.J.
        • Ateva E.
        • Dennis-Antwi J.A.
        • Davis D.
        • Dixon L.
        • Johnson P.
        • et al.
        Midwifery is a vital solution-What is holding back global progress?.
        Birth. 2019; 46: 396
        • Kennedy H.P.
        • Cheyney M.
        • Dahlen H.G.
        • Downe S.
        • Foureur M.J.
        • Homer C.S.E.
        • et al.
        Asking different questions: a call to action for research to improve the quality of care for every woman, every child.
        Birth. 2018; 0https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12361
        • ICM
        Moyo Nester T. International Confederation of Midwives Twinning Manual, B.M.A. 2014
      1. Japanese Midwives Association. Midwives Reducing Obesity in Mongolia: ESPOIR SANOFI 2018 [1-08-2018]. Available from: http://www.m2025-weobservatory.org/midwives-reducing-obesity-in-mongolia.html.

        • Sandwell R.
        • Bonser D.
        • Hebert E.
        • Kilroy K.
        • Leshabari S.
        • Mwanga F.
        • et al.
        Stronger together: midwifery twinning between Tanzania and Canada.
        Global. Health. 2018; 14: 123https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0442-x
      2. midwives4mothers. twinning up North [website]. midwives4mothrs; 2019. twinning project Iceland and The Netherlands]. Available from: https://midwives4mothers.nl/projecten/twinning-up-north/. [cited 2019].

        • Ireland J.
        Twinning in Nepal: the royal college of midwives UK and the midwifery society of Nepal working in partnership.
        J. Asian Midwives. 2015; 2: 26-33
        • Cadée F.
        • Nieuwenhuijze Marianne J.
        • Lagro-Janssen Antoine L.M.
        • de Vries Raymond
        Embrace the Complex Dynamics of Twinning!.
        (forthcoming)2020
        • Cadée F.
        • Nieuwenhuijze M.J.
        • Lagro-Janssen A.L.
        • de Vries R.
        From equity to power: Critical Success Factors for Twinning between midwives, a Delphi study.
        J. Adv. Nurs. 2018; 74: 1573-1582
        • Weyreter M.
        Germany and the town twinning movement.
        Contemp. Rev. 2003; 282: 37-43
        • University of Wisconcin-Madison
        Ethiopia Global Health Twinning. A Global Health Partnership Between the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Addis Ababa University.
        University of Wisconcin-Madison, 2009 (Available from: https://www.surgery.wisc.edu/international-collaborations/ethiopia-global-health-twinning-partnerships/. [cited 1 September 2019])
      3. RCM. Royal College of Midwives, Global midwifery twinning project. Final report. 2015.

        • Ndenga E.
        • Uwizeye G.
        • Thomson D.R.
        • Uwitonze E.
        • Mubiligi J.
        • Hedt-Gauthier B.L.
        Assessing the twinning model in the Rwandan human resources for health program: goal setting, satisfaction and perceived skill transfer.
        Glob Health. 2016; 12https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0141-4
        • Wilson A.
        International Twinning: The Foundation for Organizational Development and Program Growth.
        (Toronto: Conference Presentation Presented at: International Confederation of Midwives Conference; 2017)2017
        • ICM
        ICM Membership Survey.
        (unpublished work)2019
        • Cadée F.
        • Nieuwenhuijze M.J.
        • Lagro-Janssen A.
        • De Vries R.
        The state of the art of twinning, a concept analysis of twinning in healthcare.
        Global. Health. 2016; 12: 66https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0205-5
      4. EC. TACIS City Twinning Programme 1999. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rur/leader2/rural-en/euro/p8-1-5.htm. [cited 7 November 2015].

        • Cooper L.
        The Twinning of Institutions: Its Use as a Technical Assistance Delivery System.
        1984
        • WHO f. World Health Organization
        Guidelines for City Twinning.
        WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2001
        • Cadée F.
        • Perdok H.
        • Sam B.
        • de Geus M.
        • Kweekel L.
        ‘Twin2twin’an innovative method of empowering midwives to strengthen their professional midwifery organisations.
        Midwifery. 2013; 29: 1145-1150
        • Kemp J.
        • Shaw E.
        • Musoke M.G.
        Developing a model of midwifery mentorship for Uganda: the MOMENTUM project 2015–2017.
        Midwifery. 2018; 59https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.01.013
        • Wilson G.
        • Johnson H.
        Knowledge, learning and practice in North–South practitioner-to-practitioner municipal partnerships.
        Local Gov. Stud. 2007; 33: 253-269
        • CCNMO
        Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects.
        CCNMO, The Netherlands2019 (Available from: https://english.ccmo.nl/investigators/legal-framework-for-medical-scientific-research/your-research-is-it-subject-to-the-wmo-or-not. [cited 19 October 2019])
      5. University. M. Ethics Review Committee Health, Medicine and Life Sciences. Website: Maatricht University, The Netherlands.
        2019 (Available from: https://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/about-um/faculties/health-medicine-and-life-sciences/research/ethics-review-committee-health. [cited 19 October 2019])
        • Levy V.
        Protective steering: a grounded theory study of the processes by which midwives facilitate informed choices during pregnancy.
        J. Adv. Nurs. 1999; 29: 104-112https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00867.x
      6. Web Application for Managing, Analyzing, and Presenting Qualitative and Mixed Method Research Data Version 7.0.23.
        SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC, Los Angeles, CA2016 (Available from:)
        www.dedoose.com
        • Network Standards for reporting qualitative research Oxford, UK
        Centre for Statistics in Medicine (CSM).
        NDORMS, University of Oxford, 2019 (Available from: http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/srqr/. [cited 19 October 2019])
        • Hide J.
        Twin Traditions in Various Cultures Medium Webpage.
        2017 (Available from: https://medium.com/@info_71574/twin-traditions-in-various-cultures-fd626a3ff847. [cited 26 August 2019])
        • Eriksen T.H.
        Jamie Cross C.G. What is Anthropology. Pluto Press, London2017 (171 p)
        • Kottak C.P.
        Cultural Anthropology: Appreciating Cultural Diversity.
        McGraw-Hill, New York, NY2011
        • Tamar Kugler G.B.
        • Kocher Martin G.
        • Sutter Matthias
        Trust between individuals and groups: groups are less trusting than individuals but just as trustworthy.
        J. Econ. Psychol. 2007; 28: 646-657https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2006.12.003
        • Möllering G.
        The nature of trust: from Georg Simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation and suspension.
        Sociology. 2001; 35: 403-420
        • Vangen S.
        • Huxham C.
        Nurturing collaborative relations building trust in interorganizational collaboration.
        J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 2003; 39: 5-31
        • Kweekel L.
        • Gerrits T.
        • Rijnders M.
        • Brown P.
        The role of trust in centeringpregnancy: building interpersonal trust relationships in group‐based prenatal care in the Netherlands.
        Birth. 2017; 44: 41-47
        • Sam D.L.
        • Berry J.W.
        Acculturation when individuals and groups of different cultural backgrounds meet.
        Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2010; 5: 472-481https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610373075
        • Glouberman S.
        • Zimmerman B.
        Complicated and complex systems: what would successful reform of Medicare look like?.
        Romanow Papers. 2002; 2: 21-53
        • Cilliers P.
        Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems.
        Routledge, 2002
        • Ramaswamy R.
        • Reed J.
        • Livesley N.
        • Boguslavsky V.
        • Garcia-Elorrio E.
        • Sax S.
        • et al.
        Unpacking the black box of improvement.
        Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2018; 30: 15-19
        • Pawluch Dorothy N.E.
        Bourgeault I.D.R. Raymond de Vries What is Grounded Theory and Where Does it Come From. SAGE, London2010 (760 p)