Advertisement

Subversive acts and everyday midwifery: Feminism in content and context

      Abstract

      Background

      Midwives are often at the forefront of political campaigns for women's empowerment, overtly advocating for women's rights and reproductive justice. However, midwives can also be found engaging in inadvertent activism on a daily basis within routine care. When casting a feminist lens over both the content and context of midwifery practice in Australia, subversive acts and opportunities for feminist reform can be found.

      Aim

      To interrogate the significance of feminism in midwifery practice, identifying feminist successes and further opportunities for implementation including: analysis of the Midwifery Standards for Practice; the primary tenets of woman-centred care; the content versus context of midwifery in Australia; and feminist opportunities for enhanced practice. This paper will discuss the importance of feminism in midwifery practice and its significance in informing optimal midwifery care.

      Discussion

      Incorporating women's voice and respecting women's bodies and agency in the delivery of care is a fundamental component of midwifery practice. However, while the content of midwifery practice is innately feminist in its emphasis on woman-centred care, it will be argued that the context of birthing in Australia is not. The resultant effect is the emergence of victim blaming in maternity care and the construction of an archetypal ‘good birthing woman’.

      Implications and recommendations

      Moving away from the myth of the ‘good birthing woman’ and the act of victim blaming, midwifery could instead direct its focus towards challenging the rigid systems and structures within which midwives implement care. By further embracing feminist principles midwives will ensure a truly woman-centred future.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Lorde A.
        A Burst of Light and Other Essays.
        Courier Dover Publications, USA2017
        • Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia
        Midwife Standards for Practice.
        2018 (Available from: https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Professional-standards/Midwife-standards-for-practice.aspx)
        • Catling C.
        • Reid F.
        • Hunter B.
        Australian midwives’ experiences of their workplace culture.
        Women Birth. 2017; 30: 137-145
        • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
        Australia's Mothers and Babies 2017 – In Brief.
        2019 (Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/2a0c22a2-ba27-4ba0-ad47-ebbe51854cd6/aihw-per-100-in-brief.pdf.aspx?inline=true)
        • Kruger G.
        • McCann T.
        Challenges to midwives’ scope of practice in providing women's birthing care in an Australian hospital setting: a grounded theory study.
        Sexual Reprod. Healthcare. 2018; 18: 37-42
        • Homer C.
        Models of maternity care: evidence for midwifery continuity of care.
        Med. J. Aust. 2016; 205: 370-374
        • McLachlan H.
        • et al.
        Is the organisation and structure of hospital postnatal care a barrier to quality care? Findings from a state-wide review in Victoria, Australia.
        Midwifery. 2008; 24: 358-370
        • Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia
        Midwife Standards for Practice Released.
        2018 (Available from: https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/News/2018-05-01-midwife-standards.aspx)
        • Sweet L.
        • et al.
        Development and validation of the Australian Midwifery Standards Assessment Tool (AMSAT) to the Australian Midwife Standards for Practice 2018.
        Women Birth. 2019; 33: 135-144
        • Harkness M.
        • Cheyne H.
        Myles Textbooks for Midwives 1953 and 2014, a feminist critical discourse analysis.
        Midwifery. 2019; 76: 1-7
        • Lasser J.
        Diversity and social justice in maternity care as an ethical concern.
        Midwifery Today Int. Midwife. 2011; 100: 48-50
        • Cambridge Dictionary
        Subversive.
        2020 (Available from: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/subversive)
        • Oxford English Dictionary
        Subversive.
        2020 (Available from: https://www-oed-com.ezproxy-b.deakin.edu.au/view/Entry/193260?)
        • World Economic Forum
        The Global Gender Gap Report 2018.
        2018 (Available from: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-gender-gap-report-2018)
        • Pedelty M.
        • Kuecker M.
        Seen to be heard? Gender, voice, and body in television advertisements.
        Commun. Crit./Cult. Stud. 2014; 11: 250-269
        • Collins P.
        • Chepp V.
        Intersectionality.
        The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. 2013 (Available from: https://sage-pilot.uq.edu.au/files/151/oxford_handbook_intersectionality.pdf)
        • Thompson D.
        Midwives and pregnant women of color: why we need to understand intersectional changes in midwifery to reclaim home birth.
        Colum. J. Race L. 2016; 6: 27
        • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
        Family, Domestic and Sexual Violence in Australia 2018.
        2018 (Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/domestic-violence/family-domestic-sexual-violence-in-australia-2018/contents/summary)
        • Australian Human Rights Commission
        Sexual Harassment.
        2018 (Available from: https://www.humanrights.gov.au/our-work/sex-discrimination/projects/sexual-harassment)
        • Saftner M.
        • Neerrland C.
        • Avery M.
        Enhancing women's confidence for physiologic birth: maternity care providers’ perspectives.
        Midwifery. 2017; 52: 28-34
        • Davison C.
        • Geraghty S.
        • Dobbs K.
        The F word: midwifery students’ understanding of feminism.
        Br. J. Midwifery. 2018; 26: 731-737
        • MacLellan J.
        Claiming an ethic of care for midwifery.
        Nurs. Ethics. 2014; 21: 803-811
        • Jenkinson B.
        • Kruske S.
        • Kildea S.
        The experiences of women, midwives and obstetricians when women decline recommended maternity care: a feminist thematic analysis.
        Midwifery. 2017; 52: 1-10
        • Brady S.
        • et al.
        Woman-centred care: an integrative review of the empirical literature.
        Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2019; 94: 107-119
        • Homer C.
        • et al.
        The role of the midwife in Australia: views of women and midwives.
        Midwifery. 2009; 25: 673-681
        • Spendlove Z.
        Risk and boundary work in contemporary maternity care: tensions and consequences.
        Health Risk Soc. 2018; 20: 63-80
        • Robertson J.
        • Thomson A.
        An exploration of the effects of clinical negligence litigation on the practice of midwives in England: a phenomenological study.
        Midwifery. 2016; 33: 55-63
        • Dahlen H.G.
        • Caplice S.
        What do midwives fear?.
        Women Birth. 2014; 27: 266-270
        • Menke J.
        • et al.
        Midwives perceptions of organisational structures and processes influencing their ability to provide caseload care to socially disadvantaged and vulnerable women.
        Midwifery. 2014; 30: 1096-1103
        • Feeley C.
        • Thomson G.
        • Downe S.
        Caring for women making unconventional birth choices: a meta-ethnography exploring the views, attitudes, and experiences of midwives.
        Midwifery. 2019; 72: 50-59
        • Fox D.
        • Sheehan A.
        • Homer C.
        Birthplace in Australia: processes and interactions during the intrapartum transfer of women from planned homebirth to hospital.
        Midwifery. 2018; 57: 18-25
        • Dahlen H.G.
        • Jackson M.
        • Stevens J.
        Homebirth, freebirth and doulas: casualty and consequences of a broken maternity system.
        Women Birth. 2011; 24: 47-50
        • Gatison A.M.E.
        Communicating Women's Health: Social and Cultural Norms that Influence Health Decisions.
        Routledge, NY2015
        • Leap N.
        • Edwards N.
        The politics of involving women in decision making.
        in: Page L.A. The New Midwifery: Science and Sensitivity in Practice. Elsevier Health Sciences, UK2006: 97
        • Newnham E.C.
        • McKellar L.V.
        • Pincombe J.I.
        Paradox of the institution: findings from a hospital labour ward ethnography.
        BMC Pregn. Childbirth. 2017; 17: 2
        • Betron M.
        • et al.
        Expanding the agenda for addressing mistreatment in maternity care: a mapping review and gender analysis.
        Reprod. Health. 2018; 15: 143
        • Guilliland K.
        Feminism is the framework that we should use when we look at how to provide care.
        Midwives Magazine. Royal College of Midwives, UK2016: 21