Advertisement

Woman centred care: Has the definition been morphing of late?

      The International Year of the Nurse and Midwife (2020) provided us with many challenges, during what should have been a year of celebration. This Special Issue honours the contributions midwives make to excellence in caring for women and their babies. We include papers from around the world, with topics ranging from supporting women and midwives during COVID-19, to workforce, education, models of care, politics and much more. At the heart of our profession is the deeply valued philosophy of woman centred care. While there are many ways woman centred care is referred to (including erroneously as women centred care), it has roots in midwifery. Continuity of midwifery care is often seen as an integral part of this. Taking an example from Australia over the past 20 years, we call on midwives around the world to be vigilant about how this central underpinning philosophy can be changed in subtle but powerful ways.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia
        Midwife Standards for Practice.
        (Retrieved from) NMBA, 2018
        • Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia
        Code of Conduct for Midwives.
        NMBA, 2018 (p. 19)
        • Council of Australian Government Health Council
        Woman-centred Care: Strategic Directions for Australian Maternity Services.
        COAG, 2019
        • Leap N.
        Woman centred care or women centred care: does it matter.
        Br. J. Midwifery. 2009; 17: 12-16
        • United Nations
        Universal Declaration on Human Rights.
        UN, Genevia2015: 1-63
        • World Health Organisation
        WHO Recommendations Intrapartum Care for a Positive Childbirth Experience.
        WHO, 2018
        • Rigg E.
        • Schmied V.
        • Peters K.
        • et al.
        Why do women choose an unregulated birth worker to birth at home in Australia: a qualitative study.
        BMC Pregnancy Birth. 2017; 17 (Research): 14https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1281-0
        • Rigg E.
        • Schmied V.
        • Peters K.
        • et al.
        A survey of women in Australia who chose the care of unregulated birthworkers for a birth at home.
        Women Birth. 2018; 901 (Research): 11https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.11.007
        • Dahlen H.Ge
        • Kumar-Hazard Be
        • Schmied Ve
        • et al.
        Birthing Outside the System: the Canary in the Coal Mine.
        Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, Abingdon, Oxon New York, NY2020 (2020)
        • Jackson M.K.
        • Schmied V.
        • Dahlen H.G.
        Birthing outside the system: the motivation behind the choice to freebirth or have a homebirth with risk factors in Australia.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20 (254–254)https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02944-6
        • Miller S.
        • Bear R.J.
        • et al.
        Midwifery partnership.
        in: Pairman S. Tracy S. Dahlen H. Midwifery Preparation for Practice. Elsevier, Chatsworth, NSW2019: 299-311
        • Sandall J.
        • Soltani H.
        • Gates S.
        • et al.
        Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.
        Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016; 4: CD004667https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5
        • McLachlan H.
        • McCourt C.
        • Coxan K.
        • et al.
        Is midwifery continuity of care better for women and babies? What is the evidence?.
        in: Holmer C. Nicky L. Brodie P. Midwifery Continuity of Care. Elsevier, Chatswood, NSW2019: 1-20
        • Davis-Floyd R.E.
        The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth.
        Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2001; 75: S5-S23
        • Dahlen D.G.
        • Downeb S.
        • Jackson M.
        • et al.
        An ethnographic study of the interaction between philosophy of childbirth and place of birth.
        Women Birth. 2019; (Research)
        • Adewuyi E.O.
        • Zhao Y.
        • Auta A.
        • et al.
        Prevalence and factors associated with non-utilization of healthcare facility for childbirth in rural and urban Nigeria: analysis of a national population-based survey.
        Scand. J. Public Health. 2017; 45 (Article): 675-682https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494817705562
        • Royal College of Midwives
        The RCM Standards for Midwivery Services in the UK.
        RCM, London, UK2016
        • Canadian Midwives Organisation
        Joint Position Statement Nurses and Midwives Collaborate on Client Centred Care.
        CMO, 2011
        www.canadianmidwives.org
        • Fontein-Kuipers Y.
        • de Groot R.
        • van Staa A.
        Woman-centered care 2.0: bringing the concept into focus.
        Eur. J. Midwifery. 2018; 2https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/91492