Advertisement

Developing an instrument to measure satisfaction with continuity of midwifery care drawing on the Delphi technique

Published:January 16, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2021.01.008

      Abstract

      Background

      Maternal satisfaction with maternity care is an important indicator of quality maternity services. Continuity of midwifery models of care are increasing in Australia and while several instruments have been developed to measure satisfaction with maternity care most of these have not been validated and there are none that are appropriate to continuity of midwifery maternity care models.

      Aim

      To develop a questionnaire to measure women’s satisfaction with maternity services provided in a continuity of midwifery care service model.

      Methods

      A modified Delphi technique was used. A heterogenous panel of eight experts provided feedback over four rounds. The starting point for the questionnaire was informed by two systematic literature reviews focusing on available instruments for measuring maternal satisfaction with maternity care and what women value continuity of midwifery models of care.

      Findings

      The Continuity of Midwifery Care Satisfaction Survey (COMcareSS) was developed after four rounds of feedback with the expert panel. The survey comprises nine domains and fifty-nine questions. The domains include demographics, maternity care outcomes, facilities, the midwife/woman relationship, building capacity-empowerment, decision making and involvement, personalised care, advice care and support and general.

      Conclusions

      Consumer satisfaction is an important indicator of quality care. This is the first instrument to be developed that is appropriate to continuity of midwifery models of care. The important next step is to pilot test the instrument to establish its validity and reliability.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Sandall J.
        • Hatem M.
        • Devane D.
        • Soltani H.
        • Gates S.
        Discussions of findings from a Cochrane review of midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women: continuity, normality and safety.
        Midwifery. 2009; 25: 8-13
        • Forster D.A.
        • McLachlan H.L.
        • Davey M.A.
        • Biro M.A.
        • Farrell T.
        • Gold L.
        • et al.
        Continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) increases women’s satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care: results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016; 16: 1-13
        • Perriman N.
        • Davis D.
        Measuring maternal satisfaction with maternity care: A systematic integrative review. What is the most appropriate, reliable and valid tool that can be used to measure matenal satisfaction with continuity of maternity care?.
        Women Birth. 2016; 29: 293-299
        • Petry K.
        • Maes B.
        • Vlaskamp C.
        Operationalizing quality of life for people with profound multiple disabilities: a Delphi study.
        J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 2007; 51: 334-349
        • Turnbull D.
        • Baghurst P.
        • Collins C.
        • Cornwell C.
        • Nixon A.
        • Donnelan-Fernandez R.
        • Antoniou G.
        An evaluation of Midwifery Group Practice. Part 1: clinical effectiveness.
        Women Birth. 2009; 22: 3-9
      1. Australian Council of Healthcare Standards 2019. Retrieved from https://www.achs.org.au.

        • Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care
        National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards.
        (Sydney: ACSQHC)2012
        • Britton J.R.
        The assessment of satisfaction with care in the perinatal period.
        J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012; 33: 37-44
        • Scheerhagen M.
        • van Stel H.F.
        • Birnie E.
        • Franx A.
        • Bonsel G.J.
        Measuring client experiences in maternity care under change: development of a questionnaire based on WHO responsiveness model.
        PLoS One. 2015; 10e0117031
        • LaVela Sl
        • Gallan A.S.
        Evaluation and measurement of patient experience.
        Patient Exp. J. 2014; 1: 28-36
        • Draper M.
        • Cohen P.
        • Buchan H.
        Seeking consumer views: what use are results of hospital patient satisfaction surveys?.
        Int. J. Qual. Healthcare. 2001; 13: 463-468
        • Grigg C.P.
        • Tracy S.K.
        • Schmied V.
        • Daellenbach R.
        • Kensington M.
        Women׳s birthplace decision-making, the role of confidence: part of the evaluating Maternity Units study, New Zealand.
        Midwifery. 2015; 31: 597-605
        • Harvey S.
        • Rach D.
        • Stainton M.C.
        • Jarrell J.
        • Brant R.
        Evaluation of satisfaction with midwifery care.
        Midwifery. 2002; 18: 260-267
        • Australian College of Midwives
        Continuity of Care – a Summary of the Evidence.
        (Retrieved from)2018
        • Homer C.
        Models of maternity care: evidence for midwifery continuity of care.
        Med. J. Aust. 2016; 205
        • Keeney S.
        • Hasson F.
        • McKenna H.
        The Delphi Technique in Nursing and Health Research.
        John Wiley and Sons Ltd., West Sussex, United Kingdom2006
        • Kezar A.
        • Maxey D.
        The Delphi technique: an untapped approach of participatory research.
        Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2016; 19: 143-160
        • Rowe G.
        • Wright G.
        Expert opinions in forecasting: the role of the Delphi technique.
        in: Principles of Forecasting. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. vol 30. Springer, Boston2001
        • Gerrisk K.
        • Lathlean J.
        The Research Process in Nursing.
        7th ed. Wiley Blackwell, West Sussex, United Kingdom2015
        • Vernon W.
        The delphi technique: a review.
        Int. J. Ther. Rehabil. 2009; 16: 1759-1779X
      2. Qualtrix. Retrieved from https://www.qualtrics.com/au.

        • Perriman N.
        • Davis D.
        • Ferguson S.
        What women value in the midwifery continuity of care model: a systematic review with meta-synthesis.
        Midwifery. 2018; 62: 220-229
        • International Confederation of Midwives
        • Philosophy and Model of Midwifery Care
        The Hague: International Confederation of Midwives.
        (Retrieved from)2014
        www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/definitions-files/2018/06/eng-philosophy-and-model-of-midwifery-care.pdf
      3. Miller S., Wilkes L.J.M. Working in Partnership 2015; 3:412-427.

        • Hibbert P.
        • Saeed F.
        • Taylor N.
        • Clay-Williams R.
        • Winata T.
        • Clay C.
        • et al.
        Can benchmarking Australian hospitals for quality identify and improve high and low performers? Disseminating research findings for hospitals.
        Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2020; 32: 84-88
        • Evans A.
        Amplifying accountability by benchmarking results at district and national levels.
        Dev. Policy Rev. 2018; 36: 221-240
        • Wait S.
        • Nolte E.
        Benchmarking health systems: trends, conceptual issues and future perspectives.
        Benchmarking Int. J. 2005; 12: 436-448
        • Escuriet R.
        • White J.
        • Beeckman K.
        • Frith L.
        • Leon-Larios F.
        • Loytved C.
        • et al.
        Assessing the performance of maternity care in Europe: a critical exploration of tools and indicators.
        BMC Health Serv. Res. 2015; 15: 491
        • Hertzog M.A.
        Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies.
        Res. Nurs. Health. 2008; 31: 180-191
        • Redshaw M.
        Women as consumers of maternity care: measuring ‘satisfaction’ or ‘dissatisfaction’.
        Birth. 2008; 35: 73-76