Advertisement

Management and sustainability of midwifery group practice: Thematic and lexical analyses of midwife interviews

      Abstract

      Background

      Although there is high-level evidence supporting positive perinatal outcomes for midwifery group practice (MGP) care, not all women can access this model due to a failure to implement or sustain it. The way that MGPs are managed could be an important factor in whether they are successful in the long-term.

      Aim

      To explore what determines optimal management of MGP in Australia, and the influence it has on sustainability of MGP.

      Methods

      Interviews were conducted with MGP midwives (n = 8). Transcriptions of the audio recordings were analysed thematically and lexically for triangulation.

      Findings

      Following a thematic analysis of the data, an over-arching theme emerged – namely — being valued and supported, with three sub-themes: a nice little sweet spot, someone to stand up for you, and building relationships and support beyond the model. This revealed that value and support by all stakeholders, including the midwives themselves, was necessary to sustain an MGP. The lexical analysis revealed the themes: support, the system, and the caseload. This analysis highlighted the importance of the system – specifically, the impact of the institution on how MGP is operationalised.

      Conclusion

      For MGP to be sustained in Australia, it needs to be prioritised, nurtured, and embraced by the whole maternity care system. Management plays an important role in ensuring the right people are employed to pivotal positions and that midwifery-led models of care are valued and supported throughout the system.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Homer C.
        Establishing Models of Continuity of Midwifery Care in Australia: a Resource for Midwives and Managers.
        Centre for Family Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Sydney, N.S.W. Sydney, N.S.W2001
        • Sandall J.
        Choice, continuity and control: changing midwifery.
        Midwifery. 1995; 11: 201-209
        • Sandall J.
        Midwives’ burnout and continuity of care.
        Br. J. Midwifery. 1997; 5: 106-111
        • McLachlan H.L.
        • Forster D.A.
        • Davey M.-A.
        • et al.
        COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with one-to-one midwifery support: a randomised controlled trial.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008; 8: 35-
        • Tracy S.
        • Hartz D.L.
        • Hall B.
        • et al.
        A randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery care: [email protected] (Midwives @ New Group practice Options).
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011; 11
        • Sandall J.
        • Soltani H.
        • Gates S.
        • Shennan A.
        • Devane D.
        Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.
        Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016; 4 (CD004667)
        • Forster D.A.
        • McLachlan H.L.
        • Davey M.-A.
        • et al.
        Continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) increases women’s satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care: results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016; 16: 28
        • Tracy S.
        • Welsh A.
        • Hall B.
        • et al.
        Caseload midwifery compared to standard or private obstetric care for first time mothers in a public teaching hospital in Australia: a cross sectional study of cost and birth outcomes.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 46
        • McLachlan H.L.
        • Forster D.A.
        • Davey M.A.
        • et al.
        Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial.
        BJOG: An Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2012; 119: 1483-1492
        • Homer C.
        Models of maternity care: evidence for midwifery continuity of care.
        Med. J. Aust. 2016; 205: 370-374
        • Dawson K.
        • Forster D.A.
        • McLachlan H.L.
        • Newton M.S.
        Operationalising caseload midwifery in the Australian public maternity system: findings from a national cross-sectional survey of maternity managers.
        Women Birth. 2018; 31: 194-201
        • Forster D.A.
        • Newton M.
        • McLachlan H.L.
        • Willis K.
        Exploring implementation and sustainability of models of care: can theory help?.
        BMC Public Health. 2011; 11
        • Miller S.
        • Bear R.J.
        Midwifery partnership.
        in: Pairman S. Tracy S.K. Dahlen H.G. Dixon L. Midwifery: Preparation for Practice. 4 ed. Elsevier, Chatswood2019
        • Dawson K.
        • McLachlan H.
        • Newton M.
        • Forster D.
        Implementing caseload midwifery: exploring the views of maternity managers in Australia – a national cross-sectional survey.
        Women Birth. 2016; 29: 214-222
        • Menke J.
        • Fenwick J.
        • Gamble J.
        • Brittain H.
        • Creedy D.K.
        Midwives’ perceptions of organisational structures and processes influencing their ability to provide caseload care to socially disadvantaged and vulnerable women.
        Midwifery. 2014; 30: 1096-1103
        • Braun V.
        • Clarke V.
        • Ranc N.
        How to use thematic analysis with interview data.
        in: Vossler A. Moller N. The Counselling & Psychotherapy Research Handbook. Sage Publications, 2014: 173-184
        • Quirkos
        Simple Qualitative Analysis Software.
        2021
      1. Leximancer 2020. https://info.leximancer.com/.

        • Lemon L.L.
        • Hayes J.
        Enhancing trustworthiness of qualitative findings: using leximancer for qualitative data analysis triangulation.
        Qualitative Rep. 2020; 25: 604-614
        • Morse J.M.
        Reframing rigor in qualitative inquiry.
        in: Denzin N. Lincoln Y.S. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 5 ed. 2018
        • Connelly L.M.
        Trustworthiness in qualitative research.
        Medsurg. Nurs. 2016; 25: 435-436
        • Morrow S.L.
        Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology.
        J. Couns. Psychol. 2005; 52: 250-260
        • Lincoln Y.S.
        • Guba E.G.
        Naturalistic Inquiry.
        Beverly Hills, Calif. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Calif1985
        • Patton M.Q.
        Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis.
        Health Serv. Res. 1999; 34: 1189-1208
        • Hyndman B.
        • Pill S.
        What’s in a concept? A Leximancer text mining analysis of physical literacy across the international literature.
        Eur. Phy. Educ. Rev. 2018; 24: 292-313
        • Smith A.E.
        • Humphreys M.S.
        Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping.
        Behav. Res. Methods. 2006; 38: 262-279
        • Dadich A.
        • Jarrett C.
        Understanding practitioner perspectives of youth healthcare using thematic and lexical analyses.
        Health Expect. 2019; 22: 1144-1155
        • Braun V.
        • Clarke V.
        Successful Qualitative Research: a Practical Guide for Beginners.
        Sage, London2013
        • Nowell L.S.
        • Norris J.M.
        • White D.E.
        • Moules N.J.
        Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria.
        Int. J. Qual. Methods. 2017; 16 (160940691773384)
        • Braun V.
        • Clarke V.
        Using Thematic analysis in psychology.
        Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006; 3: 77-101
        • Leximancer
        Leximancer User Guide: Release 4.5.
        2018
        • Dadich A.
        • Wyer M.
        Patient involvement in healthcare-associated infection research: a lexical review.
        Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2018; 39: 710-717
        • Angus D.
        • Rintel S.
        • Wiles J.
        Making sense of big text: a visual-first approach for analysing text data using Leximancer and Discursis.
        Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2013; 16: 261-267
        • Leximancer
        Understanding Displays and Outputs.
        2013
        • Collins C.T.
        • Fereday J.
        • Pincombe J.
        • Oster C.
        • Turnbull D.
        An evaluation of the satisfaction of midwives’ working in midwifery group practice.
        Midwifery. 2010; 26: 435-441
        • Newton M.
        • McLachlan H.
        • Willis K.
        • Forster D.
        Comparing satisfaction and burnout between caseload and standard care midwives: findings from two cross-sectional surveys conducted in Victoria, Australia.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 1-16
        • Tracy S.K.
        • Hartz D.L.
        • Tracy M.
        • et al.
        Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: [email protected], a randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2013; 382: 1723-1732
        • Leap N.
        • Dahlen H.G.
        • Brodie P.
        • Tracy S.K.
        • Thorpe J.
        Relationships the glue that holds it all together.
        in: Davies L. Daellenbach R. Kensington M. In Sustainability, Midwifery, and Birth Abingdon. Routledge, Oxon2011: 61-74
        • Pyles L.
        Healing Justice: Holistic Self-Care for Change Makers.
        Oxford University Press, Incorporated, Oxford2018 (2018)
        • Hewitt L.
        • Priddis H.
        • Dahlen H.G.
        What attributes do Australian midwifery leaders identify as essential to effectively manage a Midwifery Group Practice?.
        Women Birth. 2019; 32: 168-177
        • Byrom S.
        • Kay L.
        Midwifery leadership: theory, practice and potential.
        in: Downe S. Byrom S. Simpson L. Essential Midwifery Practice: Leadership Expertise and Collaborative Working. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex, U.K2011: 7-22
        • Raelin J.
        Preparing for leaderful practice.
        T+D (Alexandria, Va). 2004; 58: 64
        • Raelin J.A.
        Introduction to leadership-As-practice.
        in: Raelin J.A. Leadership-As-Practice: Theory and Application. Routledge, New York2016: 1-17
        • Raelin J.A.
        Toward a methodology for studying leadership-as-practice.
        Leadership (London, England). 2019; 16 (174271501988283-508)
        • Fletcher J.K.
        Castrating the female advantage, feminist standpoint research and management science.
        J. Manag. Inq. 1994; 3: 74-82
        • Ford J.
        Gendered relationships and the problem of diversity in leadership-As-practice.
        in: Raelin J.A. Leadership-As-Practice: Theory and Application. Routledge, New York2016: 223-241
        • Kirkham M.
        Sustained by joy, the potential of flow experience for midwives and mothers.
        in: Davies L. Daellenbach R. Kensington M. Sustainability, Midwifery and Birth. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY2011: 87-100
        • Davis-Floyd R.
        The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth.
        Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2001; 75: S5-S23
        • Brodie P.
        Addressing the barries to midwifery – Australian midwives speaking out.
        Aust. Coll. Midwives Inc. J. 2002; 15: 5-13
        • Hartz D.L.
        • White J.
        • Lainchbury K.
        • et al.
        Australian maternity reform through clinical redesign.
        Aust. Health Rev. 2012; 36: 169-175
        • Hartz D.L.
        • White J.
        • Lainchbury K.A.
        • et al.
        Australian maternity reform through clinical redesign.
        Aust. Health Rev. 2012; 36: 6-
        • Crevani L.
        • Endrissat N.
        Mapping the leasdership-as-practice terrain.
        in: Raelin J.A. Leadership-As-Practice: Theory and Application (Pp 1-17). Routledge, New York2016: 21-49
        • Catling C.J.
        • Reid F.
        • Hunter B.
        Australian midwives’ experiences of their workplace culture.
        Women Birth. 2017; 30: 137-145