Advertisement

Midwives’ insights in relation to the common barriers in providing effective perinatal care to women from ethnic minority groups with ‘high risk’ pregnancies: A qualitative study

      Abstract

      Problem

      Childbearing women from ethnic minority groups in the United Kingdom (UK) have significantly poorer perinatal outcomes overall.

      Background

      Childbearing women from ethnic minority groups report having poorer experiences and outcomes in perinatal care, and health professionals report having difficulty in providing effective care to them. Yet barriers in relation to providing such care remain underreported.

      Aim

      The aim of this study was to elicit midwives' insights in relation to the common barriers in providing effective perinatal care to women from ethnic minority groups with 'high risk' pregnancies and how to overcome these barriers.

      Methods

      A qualitative study was undertaken in a single obstetric led unit in London, UK. A thematic analysis was undertaken to identify themes from the data.

      Findings

      A total of 20 midwives participated. They self-identified as White British (n = 7), Black African (n = 7), Black Caribbean (n = 3) and Asian (n = 3). Most (n = 12) had more than 10 years’ experience practising as a registered midwife (range 2 – 35 years). Four themes were identified: 1) Communication, 2) Continuity of carer, 3) Policy and 4) Social determinants. Racism and unconscious bias underpin many of the findings presented.

      Discussion

      Co-created community hubs may improve access to more effective care for childbearing women from ethnic minority groups. A focus on robust anti-racism interventions, continuity of carer, staff wellbeing and education along with the provision of orientation and bespoke translation services are also suggested for the reduction of poorer outcomes and experiences.

      Conclusion

      Along with policies designed to promote equality and irradicate racism, there is a need for co-created community hubs and continuity of carer in perinatal services. Further research is also required to develop and evaluate culturally safe, and evidence-based interventions designed to address the current disparities apparent.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Knight M.
        • Bunch K.
        • Kenyon S.
        • Tuffnell D.
        • Kurinczuk J.J.
        A national population‐based cohort study to investigate inequalities in maternal mortality in the United Kingdom, 2009-17.
        Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2020; : 392-398
        • Kingdon C.
        • Roberts D.
        • Turner M.A.
        • Storey C.
        • Crossland N.
        • Finlayson K.W.
        • Downe S.
        Inequalities and stillbirth in the UK: A meta-narrative review.
        BMJ Open. 2019; 9: e029672-2019
        • Heslehurst N.
        • Brown H.
        • Pemu A.
        • Coleman H.
        • Rankin J.
        Perinatal health outcomes and care among asylum seekers and refugees: A systematic review of systematic reviews.
        BMC medicine. 2018; 16: 89
        • World Health Organization
        Report on the health of refugees and migrants in the WHO European region: No public health without refugees and migrant health.
        2018
        • Lee S.
        • Ayers S.
        • Holden D.
        A metasynthesis of risk perception in women with high-risk pregnancies.
        Midwifery. 2014; 30: 403-411
        • Rees P.H.
        • Wohland P.
        • Norman P.
        • Lomax N.
        • Clark S.D.
        Population projections by ethnicity: Challenges and solutions for the United Kingdom.
        The frontiers of applied demography. Springer, 2017: 383-408
        • Nellums L.B.
        • Powis J.
        • Jones L.
        • Miller A.
        • Rustage K.
        • Russell N.
        • Friedland J.S.
        • Hargreaves S.
        “It’s a life you’re playing with”: A qualitative study on experiences of NHS maternity services among undocumented migrant women in England.
        Soc Sci Med. 2021; 270113610
        • Hiam L.
        • Orcutt M.
        • Yates R.
        Universal health coverage in the UK.
        BMJ. 2019; 367: l7054
        • Laird L.D.
        • Amer M.M.
        • Barnett E.D.
        • Barnes L.L.
        Muslim patients and health disparities in the UK and the US.
        Arch Dis Child. 2007; 92: 922-926
        • Bulman K.H.
        • McCourt C.
        Somali refugee women’s experiences of maternity care in west London: A case study.
        Critical Public Health. 2002; 12: 365-380
        • MacKinnon M.
        • Howard L.
        Affirming immigrant women’s health: Building inclusive health policy.
        Maritime centre for excellence in women’s health. 2000; ([https://cdn.dal.ca/content/dam/dalhousie/pdf/diff/ace-women-health/ACEWH_immigrant_womens_health_inclusive_policy.pdf]. [Accessed 19 May 2021])
        • Higginbottom G.M.A.
        • Evans C.
        • Morgan M.
        • Bharj K.K.
        • Eldridge J.
        • Hussain B.
        Experience of and access to maternity care in the UK by immigrant women: A narrative synthesis systematic review.
        BMJ Open. 2019; 9: e029478-2019
        • Jomeen J.
        • Redshaw M.
        Ethnic minority women’s experience of maternity services in England.
        Ethn Health. 2013; 18: 280-296
        • Amineh R.J.
        • Asl H.D.
        Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences.
        Literature and Languages. 2015; 1: 9-16
        • Flick U.
        Mapping the field. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis.
        2014: 1-18
        • Braun V.
        • Clarke V.
        Using thematic analysis in psychology.
        Qualitative research in psychology. 2006; 3: 77-101
        • Curtin M.
        • Fossey E.
        Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: Guidelines for occupational therapists.
        Aust Occup Ther J. 2007; 54: 88-94
      1. QSR. NVivo qualitative data analysis Software. (Version 12). https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home ed; 2021.

        • Wren Serbin J.
        • Donnelly E.
        The impact of racism and midwifery’s lack of racial diversity: A literature review.
        J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2016; 61: 694-706
        • Esegbona-Adeigbe S.
        Cultural qualities and antenatal care for black African women: A literature review.
        British Journal of Midwifery. 2018; 26: 532-539
        • Yoder H.
        • Hardy L.R.
        Midwifery and antenatal care for black women: A narrative review.
        SAGE Open. 2018; 8 (2158244017752220)
        • Sporek P.E.
        Unconscious bias.
        British journal of midwifery. 2015; 23: 910
        • Hassen N.
        • Lofters A.
        • Michael S.
        • Mall A.
        • Pinto A.D.
        • Rackal J.
        Implementing anti-racism interventions in healthcare settings: A scoping review.
        International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18: 2993
        • England N
        The NHS long term plan.
        NHS England, 2019
        • Homer C.S.
        • Leap N.
        • Edwards N.
        • Sandall J.
        Midwifery continuity of carer in an area of high socio-economic disadvantage in London: A retrospective analysis of Albany midwifery practice outcomes using routine data (1997–2009).
        Midwifery. 2017; 48: 1-10
        • Asif S.
        • Baugh A.
        • Jones N.W.
        The obstetric care of asylum seekers and refugee women in the UK.
        The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 2015; 17: 223-231
        • Cumberlege J.
        BETTER BIRTHS Improving outcomes of maternity services in England: A Five Year Forward View for maternity care.
        (Available from:) NHS England, London2016
        • Rayment‐Jones H.
        • Harris J.
        • Harden A.
        • Khan Z.
        • Sandall J.
        How do women with social risk factors experience United Kingdom maternity care? A realist synthesis.
        Birth. 2019; 46: 461-474
        • Rayment-Jones H.
        • Murrells T.
        • Sandall J.
        An investigation of the relationship between the caseload model of midwifery for socially disadvantaged women and childbirth outcomes using routine data–a retrospective, observational study.
        Midwifery. 2015; 31: 409-417
        • McCourt C.
        • Pearce A.
        Does continuity of carer matter to women from minority ethnic groups?.
        Midwifery. 2000; 16: 145-154
        • Tracy S.K.
        • Welsh A.
        • Hall B.
        • Hartz D.
        • Lainchbury A.
        • Bisits A.
        • White J.
        • Tracy M.B.
        Caseload midwifery compared to standard or private obstetric care for first time mothers in a public teaching hospital in Australia: A cross sectional study of cost and birth outcomes.
        BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014; 14: 46
        • Fenwick J.
        • Sidebotham M.
        • Gamble J.
        • Creedy D.K.
        The emotional and professional wellbeing of Australian midwives: A comparison between those providing continuity of midwifery care and those not providing continuity.
        Women and Birth. 2018; 31: 38-43
        • Styles C.
        • Kearney L.
        • George K.
        Implementation, and upscaling of midwifery continuity of care: The experience of midwives and obstetricians.
        Women and Birth. 2020; 33: 343-351
        • Maria Raisa Jessica V Aquino
        • Edge D.
        • Smith D.M.
        Pregnancy as an ideal time for intervention to address the complex needs of black and minority ethnic women: Views of British midwives.
        Midwifery. 2015; 31: 373-379
        • Ochieng B.M.
        Black African migrants: The barriers with accessing and utilizing health promotion services in the UK.
        The European Journal of Public Health. 2013; 23: 265-269
        • Kasten M.J.
        • Berman A.C.
        • Ebright A.B.
        • Mitchell J.D.
        • Quirindongo-Cedeno O.
        Interpreters in health care: A concise review for clinicians.
        Am J Med. 2020; 133 (424,428. e2)
        • Pezaro S.
        • Clyne W.
        • Turner A.
        • Fulton E.A.
        • Gerada C.
        ‘Midwives overboard!’ inside their hearts are breaking, their makeup may be flaking but their smile still stays on.
        Women Birth. 2015; 29: 59-66
        • Higginbottom G.M.A.
        • Evans C.
        • Morgan M.
        • Bharj K.K.
        • Eldridge J.
        • Hussain B.
        Experience of and access to maternity care in the UK by immigrant women: A narrative synthesis systematic review.
        BMJ Open. 2019; 9: e029478-2019
        • Pangas J.
        • Ogunsiji O.
        • Elmir R.
        • Raman S.
        • Liamputtong P.
        • Burns E.
        • Dahlen H.G.
        • Schmied V.
        Refugee women’s experiences negotiating motherhood and maternity care in a new country: A meta-ethnographic review.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2019; 90: 31-45
        • Metzl J.M.
        • Hansen H.
        Structural competency: Theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality.
        Soc Sci Med. 2014; 103: 126-133
        • Henderson J.
        • Carson C.
        • Jayaweera H.
        • Alderdice F.
        • Redshaw M.
        Recency of migration, region of origin and women’s experience of maternity care in England: Evidence from a large cross-sectional survey.
        Midwifery. 2018; 67: 87-94
        • Garcia R.
        • Ali N.
        • Papadopoulos C.
        • Randhawa G.
        Specific antenatal interventions for black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) pregnant women at high risk of poor birth outcomes in the United Kingdom: A scoping review.
        BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2015; 15: 226
        • Heward-Mills N.L.
        • Atuhaire C.
        • Spoors C.
        • Pemunta N.V.
        • Priebe G.
        • Cumber S.N.
        The role of faith leaders in influencing health behaviour: A qualitative exploration on the views of black African Christians in Leeds, United Kingdom.
        Pan Afr Med J. 2018; 30: 199
        • Danso A.
        • Danso Y.
        The complexities of race and health.
        Future Healthc J. 2021; 8: 22-27
        • Knight M.
        • Bunch K.
        • Vousden N.
        • Morris E.
        • Simpson N.
        • Gale C.
        • O’Brien P.
        • Quigley M.
        • Brocklehurst P.
        • Kurinczuk J.J.
        Characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women hospitalised with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the UK: A national cohort study using the UK obstetric surveillance system (UKOSS).
        medRxiv. 2020;
        • Knight M.
        • Bunch K.
        • Al Cairns A.
        e. saving lives, improving mothers’ care rapid report: Learning from SARS-CoV-2-related and associated maternal deaths in the UK March–May 2020.
        MBRRACE-UK. 2020; (Available from:)
        • Aquino, Maria Raisa Jessica V.
        • Edge D.
        • Smith D.M.
        Pregnancy as an ideal time for intervention to address the complex needs of black and minority ethnic women: Views of British midwives.
        Midwifery. 2015; 31: 373-379