Advertisement

A literature review to determine midwifery students’ perceived essential qualities of preceptors to increase confidence and competence in the clinical environment

      Abstract

      Background

      Midwifery students’ experiences with preceptors in the clinical environment plays an integral role in developing the confidence and competence of students. As up to 50% of the midwifery program is taught in the clinical environment, an analysis of the preceptorship role in the context of midwifery student confidence and competence may be important to inform future practice and policy.

      Aim

      To discover, whilst on clinical placement, what is required by preceptors to suitably equip midwifery students to develop confidence and competence in the clinical environment.

      Methods

      A search of the literature was undertaken using health and midwifery related electronic databases of PubMed, CINAHL, Intermid, SCOPUS and Web of Science. Grey literature, and reference lists from studies were also part of the thorough search process.

      Findings

      After critical reading of the 15 included studies, there were a number of themes identified as the preceptor qualities that contributed to student confidence and competence. Those themes include ‘belongingness’, ‘hands on experience/skill development’, ‘students’ development of professional identity’ and ‘preceptor characteristics that impact student learning’.

      Discussion

      Student confidence and competence can be dependent on the preceptor who supports them. There are preceptors who enable students to flourish in their confidence and competence, and there also appears to be preceptors who do not possess these qualities, which requires further enquiry.

      Conclusion

      As the evidence appears to find that trained preceptors are optimal for student confidence and competence, further enquiry is warranted to inform policy and practice around the concept of preceptorship training for midwives.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bandura A.
        Self-referent mechanisms in social learning theory.
        Am. Psychol. 1979; 34: 439-441https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.34.5.439.b
        • Thomas A.
        • Menon A.
        • Boruff J.
        • Rodriguez A.
        • Ahmed S.
        Applications of social constructivist learning theories in knowledge translation for healthcare professionals: a scoping review.
        Implement. Sci. 2014; 9 (54–54)https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-54
        • Dewar B.
        • et al.
        Exploring and developing student midwives’ experiences (ESME) – an appreciative inquiry study.
        Midwifery. 2020; 91102844https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102844
        • Griffiths M.
        • et al.
        Midwifery student evaluation of practice: the MidSTEP tool – perceptions of clinical learning experiences.
        Women Birth: J. Austr. Coll. Midwives. 2019; 19https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2019.09.010
        • ANMAC
        Midwife Accreditation Standards 2014.
        Australian Nursing and Midwifery Accreditation Council, Canberra2014
        • Lennox S.
        • Skinner J.
        • Foureur M.
        Mentorship, preceptorship and clinical supervision: three key processes for supporting midwives.
        N. Z. College Midwives J. 2008; 39: 7-12
        • Schneider Z.
        Nursing and Midwifery Research: Methods and Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice.
        5th ed. Elsevier Australia, Chatswood, NSW2016
        • Lange G.
        • Kennedy H.P.
        Student perceptions of ideal and actual midwifery Practice.
        J. Midwifery Womens Health. 2006; 51: 71-77https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.10.003
        • Longworth M.K.
        An exploration of the perceived factors that affect the learning and transfer of skills taught to student midwives.
        Midwifery. 2013; 29: 831-837https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.07.013
        • McIntosh T.
        • et al.
        Final year students’ perceptions of learning to be a midwife in six British universities.
        Nurse Educ. Today. 2013; 33: 1179-1183https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.05.020
        • Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia
        Midwife Standards for Practice.
        2018
        • Hauck Y.
        • et al.
        ‘Teaching on the Run’ with Australian midwives in a tertiary maternity hospital.
        Nurse Educ. Pract. 2017; 22: 47-54https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.11.006
        • Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP)
        Qualitative Checklist.
        2018
        • Moher D.
        • Liberati A.
        • Altman D.G.
        The PRISMA group preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
        PLoS Med. 2009; 6https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed1000097
        • McKenna L.
        • et al.
        Undergraduate midwifery students’ sense of belongingness in clinical practice.
        Nurse Educ. Today. 2013; 33: 880-883https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.09.009
        • Gilmour C.
        • et al.
        Exploring the impact of clinical placement models on undergraduate midwifery students.
        Women Birth: J. Austr. Coll. Midwives. 2013; 26: e21-e25https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2012.06.004
        • Licqurish S.
        • et al.
        Midwifery students’ experiences of achieving competency for beginning practice.
        Br. J. Midwifery. 2013; 21: 874-885https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2013.21.12.874
        • Sidebotham M.
        • et al.
        Using the five senses framework to understand the experiences of midwifery students enrolled in an undergraduate degree program.
        Midwifery. 2015; 31: 201-207https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.08.007
        • Carter A.G.
        • et al.
        Midwifery students’ experiences of an innovative clinical placement model embedded within midwifery continuity of care in Australia.
        Midwifery. 2015; 31: 765-771https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.04.006
        • Thunes S.
        • Sekse R.
        Midwifery students first encounter with the maternity ward.
        Nurse Educ. Pract. 2015; 15: 243-248https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2015.01.012
        • McAra-Couper J.
        • et al.
        A mixed-method evaluation of a New Zealand based midwifery education development unit.
        Nurse Educ. Pract. 2017; 25: 57-63https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.05.002
        • Licqurish S.
        • Seibold C.
        Bachelor of midwifery students’ experiences of achieving competencies: the role of the midwife preceptor.
        Midwifery. 2008; 24: 480-489https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2007.05.001
        • Hughes A.
        • Fraser D.
        ‘There are guiding hands and there are controlling hands’: student midwives experience of mentorship in the UK.
        Midwifery. 2011; 27: 477-483https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.03.006
        • Khajehei M.
        • et al.
        The genesis and consequences of stress among midwifery students.
        Br. J. Midwifery. 2011; 19: 379-385https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2011.19.6.379
        • Bluff R.
        • Holloway I.
        The efficacy of midwifery role models.
        Midwifery. 2008; 24: 301-309https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2005.02.008
        • Jordan R.
        • Farley C.I.
        The confidence to practice midwifery: preceptor influence on student self-efficacy.
        J. Midwifery Womens Health. 2008; 53: 413-420https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.05.001