Advertisement

A grounded theory study on midwifery managers’ views and experiences of implementing and sustaining continuity of carer models within the UK maternity system

Published:November 20, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2021.10.010

      Abstract

      Background

      Current UK health policy recommends the transition of maternity services towards provision of Midwifery Continuity of Carer (MCoCer) models. Quality of healthcare is correlated with the quality of leadership and management yet there is little evidence available to identify what is required from midwifery managers when implementing and sustaining MCoCer.

      Aim

      To develop a theoretical framework that represents midwifery managers’ experiences of implementing and sustaining MCoCer models within the UK’s National Health Service (NHS).

      Methods

      Charmaz’s grounded theory approach was used for this study. Five experienced UK based midwifery managers were interviewed to elicit views and understanding of the social processes underlying the implementation and sustaining of MCoCer. Interviews were transcribed and analysed and focus codes developed into theoretical codes resulting in an emergent core category.

      Findings

      The theoretical framework illustrates the core category ‘Leading Meaningful Midwifery’. To manage MCoCer models midwifery managers require a trust and belief in woman centred philosophy of care. They need the skills to focus on non-hierarchical transformational leadership and the courage to assimilate alternative models of care into the NHS. Promoting and protecting the MCoCer model within current services is essential whilst forming a culture based on high quality, safe MCoCer.

      Discussion

      MCoCer models that have sustained within the NHS have had supportive leadership from midwifery managers who have the necessary skills, attitudes, aptitudes and behaviours identified within the findings. Sustainable implementation of MCoCer is achieved through development of a values-based recruitment and retention policy within all areas of midwifery and encouraging midwives with previous experience in MCoCer or supportive philosophies towards it, to manage the model.

      Conclusion

      Providing the appropriate support for MCoCer is time consuming and personally demanding for midwifery managers, however, implementing and sustaining MCoCer was shown by participants who valued MCoCer models to be rewarding, bringing meaning to their midwifery leadership.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bannon E.
        • Allerdice F.
        • McNeill J.
        A review of midwifery leadership.
        Br. J. Midwifery. 2017; 25: 655-661
        • The Scottish Government
        The Best Start. A Five-Year Forward Plan for Maternity and Neonatal Care in Scotland.
        The Scottish Government., Edinburgh2017
        • NHS England
        National Maternity Review-Better Births.
        NHS England, London2016
        • Homer C.
        • et al.
        Midwifery continuity of carer in an area of high socio-economic disadvantage in London: a retrospective analysis of Albany Midwifery Practice outcomes using routine data 1997–2009.
        Midwifery. 2017; 48: 1-10
        • Sandall J.
        • et al.
        Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.
        Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016;
        • Department of Health (DoH)
        Changing Childbirth.
        HMSO Publications, London1993
        • McIntosh T.
        • Hunter B.
        ‘Unfinished business’? Reflections on changing Childbirth 20 years on.
        Midwifery. 2014; 30: 279-281
        • McCourt C.
        • Stevens T.
        Continuity of carer: what does it mean, and does it matter to midwives and birthing women?.
        Can. J. Midwifery Res. Pract. 2006; 43: 10-20
      1. A. Francis (2020). https://q.health.org.uk/event/neighbourhood-midwives-the-model-that-boosted-continuity-of-care-by-500-annie-francis/.

      2. BLACK (2019). https://www.thecanary.co/discovery/analysis-discovery/2019/07/31/the-sudden-closure-of-a-midwife-service-reveals-deep-flaws-in-the-nhss-private-sector-contracts/.

        • Crowther S.
        • et al.
        Sustainability and resilience in midwifery: a discussion paper.
        Midwifery. 2016; 40: 40-48
        • Hewitt L.
        • Priddis H.
        • Dahlen H.G.
        What attributes do Australian midwifery leaders identify as essential to effectively manage a midwifery group practice?.
        Women Birth. 2019; 32: 168-177
        • MBRRACE-UK report
        Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care: Lessons Learned to Inform Maternity Care From the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries Into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2015-2017.
        University of Oxford, 2019
        • RCM
        RCM Manifesto: Leadership.
        RCM, London2019
        • Patterson J.
        • Hollins Martin C.J.
        • Karatzias T.
        Disempowered midwives and traumatised women: exploring the parallel processes of care provider interaction that contribute to women developing post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) post childbirth.
        Midwifery. 2019; 76: 21-35
        • Taylor B.
        • et al.
        Midwives’ perspectives of continuity-based working in the UK: a cross sectional survey.
        Midwifery. 2019; 75: 127-137
        • Stevens T.
        Time and Midwifery Practice, Chapter 5 in Childbirth, Midwifery and Concepts of Time, Ed McCourt.
        Berghahn, Oxford2009: 104-125
        • Cheyne H.
        • Kildea S.
        • Harris J.
        How to monitor and evaluate midwifery continuity of care.
        in: Homer C. Midwifery Continuity of Care. 2nd ed. Elsevier, Australia2019: 157-182
        • Walsh D.
        • et al.
        Factors influencing the utilisation of free-standing and alongside midwifery units in England: a qualitative research study.
        Br. Med. J. Open. 2020; 10: 1-9
        • McInnes R.J.
        • et al.
        Implementing continuity of midwife carer — just a friendly face? A realist evaluation.
        BMC Health Serv. Res. 2020; 20: 304https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05159-9
        • Clarke E.
        • et al.
        Strengthening the nursing and midwifery unit manager role: an interim programme evaluation.
        J. Nurs. Manag. 2011; 20: 120-129
        • Patton M.Q.
        Chapter 5: Designing qualitative studies. Module 30 purposeful sampling and case selection: overview of strategies and options.
        in: Patton M.Q. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. 4th ed. Sage Publications, Minnesota2015
        • Charmaz K.
        Constructing Grounded Theory.
        2nd ed. Sage, London2014
        • Glaser B.G.
        • Strauss A.L.
        The Discovery of Grounded Theory.
        Aldine, Chicago1967
        • Hall H.G.
        • McKenna L.G.
        • Griffiths D.L.
        Applying grounded theory to midwifery research problems.
        Int. J. Childbirth. 2012; 2: 136-141
        • Breckenridge J.
        • et al.
        Motivating change: a grounded theory of how to achieve large-scale, sustained change, co-created with improvement organisations across the UK.
        Br. Med. J. 2019; 8: 1-18
        • Sbaraini A.
        • et al.
        How to do a grounded theory study: a worked example of a study of dental practices.
        BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2011; 11
        • Carpenter D.R.
        Phenomenology as Method in: Qualitative Research in Nursing: Advancing the Humanistic Imperative.
        4th ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia PA2007
        • West M.
        • et al.
        Caring to Change: How Compassionate Leadership can Stimulate Innovation in Health Care.
        The King’s Fund, London2017
        • Gilley J.W.
        • Dean P.
        • Bierema L.
        Philosophy and Practice of Organisational Learning, Performance and Change.
        Perseus Publishing, Colorado2008
      3. Poole M.S. Van de Ven A.H. Handbook of Organisational Change and Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford2004
        • Cramer E.
        • Hunter B.
        Relationships between working conditions and emotional wellbeing in midwives.
        Women Birth. 2019; 32: 521-532
        • Davies L.
        • Crowther S.
        • Hunter B.
        Midwifery continuity of care: theorising towards sustainability.
        in: Homer C. Midwifery Continuity of Care. 2nd ed. Elsevier, Australia2019: 231-248
        • Hunter B.
        • et al.
        Work, Health and Emotional Lives of Midwives in the United Kingdom: The UK WHELM Study.
        School of Healthcare Sciences: Cardiff University, 2018
        • Gilkison A.
        • et al.
        Midwifery practice arrangements which sustain caseloading Lead Maternity Carer midwives in New Zealand.
        N. Z. Coll. Midwives J. 2015; 51: 11-16
        • Hardeman R.R.
        • Medina E.M.
        • Kozhimannil K.B.
        Structural racism and supporting black lives — the role of the health professionals.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 2016; 375: 2113-2115
        • Agarwal P.
        Sway: Unravelling Unconscious Bias.
        Bloomsbury, London2020
        • Whitehead K.
        Discursive Approaches to Race and Racism. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication.
        (Retrieved from) UC Santa Barbara, 2017
        • Smith L.T.
        Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples.
        2nd ed. Zed Books, 2012
        • Holly C.
        • Igwee G.
        A systematic review of the influence of transformational leadership style on nursing staff in acute care hospitals.
        Evid. Based Healthc. 2011; 9: 301-310
        • McCourt C.
        • et al.
        Organising safe and sustainable care in alongside midwifery units: findings from an organisational ethnographic study.
        Midwifery. 2018; 65: 26-34
        • Francis R.
        Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry.
        HMSO, London2013
      4. Homer C. Midwifery Continuity of Care. 2nd ed. Elsevier, Australia2019
        • Royal College of Midwives (RCM)
        Caring for You Campaign.
        RCM, London2016
        • Leap N.
        • Hunter B.
        The Midwife’s Tale: An Oral History from Handywoman to Professional Midwife.
        Pen & Sword history, Barnsley2013
        • Menke J.
        • et al.
        Midwives’ perceptions of organisational structures and processes influencing their ability to provide caseload care to socially disadvantaged and vulnerable women.
        Midwifery. 2013; 30: 1096-1103
        • Edmondson A.
        Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams.
        Adm. Sci. Q. 2016; 44: 350-383
        • Rogers C.
        On Becoming a Person.
        Constable, London2004
        • Cummings G.G.
        • et al.
        Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: a systematic review.
        Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2018; : 19-60
        • Carr E.W.
        • et al.
        The Value of Belonging at Work. [Online].
        The Harvard Business review, USA2019
        • Kouzes J.
        • Posner B.
        The Leadership Challenge: How to Make Extraordinary Things Happen in Organisations.
        6th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New Jersey2017