Advertisement

The social conception of space of birth narrated by women with negative and traumatic birth experiences

      Abstract

      Background

      Many women experience giving birth as a negative or even as a traumatic event. Birth space and its occupants are fundamentally interconnected with negative and traumatic experiences, highlighting the importance of the social space of birth.

      Aim

      To explore experiences of women who have had a negative or traumatic birth to identify the value, sense and meaning they assign to the social space of birth.

      Methods

      A feminist standpoint theory guided the research. Secondary discourse analysis of 51 qualitative data sets/transcripts from Dutch and Czech Republic postpartum women and 551 free-text responses of the Babies Born Better survey from women in the United Kingdom, Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Austria, Spain, and the Czech Republic.

      Findings

      Three themes and associated sub-themes emerged: 1. The institutional dimension of social space related to staff-imposed boundaries, rules and regulations surrounding childbirth, and a clinical atmosphere. 2. The relational dimension of social space related to negative women-healthcare provider interactions and relationships, including notions of dominance, power, authority, and control. 3. The personal dimension of social space related to how women internalised and were affected by the negative social dimensions including feelings of faith misplaced, feeling disconnected and disembodied, and scenes of horror.

      Discussion/conclusion

      The findings suggest that improving the quality of the social space of birth may promote better birth experiences for women. The institutional, relational, and personal dimensions of the social space of birth are key in the planning, organisation, and provision of maternity care.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Jouhki M.-R.
        • Suominen T.
        • Åstedt-Kurki P.
        Giving birth on our own terms–Women's experience of childbirth at home.
        Midwifery. 2017; 53: 35-41https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.07.008
        • Milan M.
        Childbirth as healing: three women’s experience of independent midwife care.
        Complement. Ther. Nurs. Midwifery. 2003; 9: 140-146https://doi.org/10.1016/s1353-6117(03)00038-6
        • Lundgren I.
        • Karlsdottir S.
        • Bondas T.
        Long-term memories and experiences of childbirth in a Nordic context—a secondary analysis.
        Int J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-being. 2009; 4: 115-128https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620802423414
        • Kurz E.
        • Davis D.
        • Browne J.
        Parturescence: a theorisation of women’s transformation through childbirth.
        Women Birth. 2021; 1 (S1871-5192(21)00045-7)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2021.03.009
        • Thomson G.
        • Downe S.
        Changing the future to change the past: women’s experiences of a positive birth following a traumatic birth experience.
        J. Reprod. Infant Psychol. 2010; 28: 102-112
        • Leinweber J.
        • Fontein-Kuipers Y.
        • Thomson G.
        • Karlsdottir S.
        • Nilsson C.
        • Ekström-Bergström
        • et al.
        Developing a woman-centred, inclusive definition of a traumatic childbirth experience: a discussion paper.
        Birth. 2021; (2022)https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12634
        • Soet J.E.
        • Brack G.
        • DiIorio C.
        Prevalence, and predictors of women’scexperience of psychological trauma during childbirth.
        Birth. 2003; 30: 36-46
        • Stramrood C.A.I.
        • Paarlberg K.M.
        • Huis In ’t Veld E.
        • Berger L.W.A.R.
        • Vingerhoets A.J.J.M.
        • Schultz W.C.M.
        • et al.
        Posttraumatic stress following childbirth in homelike‐ and hospital settings.
        J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2011; 32: 88-97
        • Boorman R.J.
        • Devilly G.J.
        • Gamble J.
        • Creedy D.K.
        • Fenwick J.
        Childbirth and criteria for traumatic events.
        Midwifery. 2014; 30: 255-261https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.03.001
        • O’Donovan A.
        • Alcorn K.
        • Patrick J.
        • Creedy D.
        • Dawe S.
        • Devilly G.
        Predicting posttraumatic stress disorder after childbirth.
        Midwifery. 2014; 30: 935-941https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.03.011
        • De Schepper S.
        • Vercauteren T.
        • Tersago J.
        • Jacquemyn Y.
        • Raes F.
        • Franck E.
        Post-traumatic stress disorder after childbirth and theinfluence of maternity team care during labour and birth: a cohort study.
        Midwifery. 2016; 32: 87-92
        • Byrne V.
        • Egan J.
        • Mac Neela P.
        • Sarma K.
        What about me? The loss of self through the experience of traumatic childbirth.
        Midwifery. 2017; 51: 1-11
        • Shin J.-H.
        • Maxwell L.E.
        • Eshelman P.
        Hospital birthing room design: a study of mother’s perceptions of hominess.
        J. Inter. Des. 2004; 30: 23-36
        • Overgaard C.
        • Fenger-Gran M.
        • Sandall J.
        The impact of birthplace on women’s birth experiences and perceptions of care.
        Soc. Sci. Med. 2012; 74: 973-981
        • Stenglin M.
        • Foureur M.
        Designing out the Fear Cascade to increase the likelihood of normal birth.
        Midwifery. 2013; 29: 819-825
        • Fontein-Kuipers Y.
        • Koster D.
        • Romeijn C.
        • Sakko E.
        • Stam C.
        • Steenhuis N.
        • et al.
        I-Poems – Listening to the voices of women with a traumatic birth experience.
        J. Psychol. Cogn. 2018; 3: 29-36https://doi.org/10.35841/psychology-cognition.3.2.29-36
        • Lock L.R.
        • Gibb H.J.
        The power of place.
        Midwifery. 2003; 19: 132-139
        • Miller S.
        • Skinner J.
        Are first time mothers who plan home birth more likely to receive evidence-based care? A comparative study of home and hospital care provided by the same midwives.
        Birth. 2012; 39: 135-144
        • Hammond A.
        • Foureur M.
        • Homer C.
        The hardware and software implications of birth unit design: a midwifery perspective.
        Midwifery. 2013; (http://dx.doi.org/15.10.1016/j.midw.2013.07.013)
        • Leinweber J.
        • Creedy D.K.
        • Rowe H.
        • Gamble J.
        Responses to birth trauma and prevalence of posttraumatic stress among Australian midwives.
        Women Birth. 2016; 30: 40-45https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.06.006
        • Zolkefli Z.H.H.
        • Mumi K.H.A.
        • Idris D.R.
        Autonomy and its impact on midwifery practice.
        Br. J. Midwifery. 2020; 28: 120-129https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2020.28.2.120
        • Fontein-Kuipers Y.
        • den Hartog-van Veen
        • Klop L.
        • Zondag L.
        Conflicting values experienced by Dutch midwives – Dilemmas of loyalty, responsibility and selfhood.
        Clin. Res. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018; 1: 1-12
        • Lepori B.
        • Foureur M.
        • Hastie C.
        Fahy K. Foureur M. Hastie C. Mindbodyspirit architecture: Creating Birth Space, in Birth Territory and Midwifery Guardianship: Theory for Practice, Education and Research. Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier, Sydney2008
        • Setola N.
        • Naldi E.
        • Coccina G.G.
        The impact of the physical environment on intrapartum maternity care: Identification of eight crucial building spaces.
        Des. J. 2019; 12: 4
        • Goldkuhl L.
        • Dellenborg L.
        • Berg M.
        • Wijk H.
        • Nilsson C.
        The influence and meaning of the birth environment fir nulliparous women at a hospital-based labour ward in Sweden: an ethnographic study.
        Women Birth. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2021.07.005
        • Olza I.
        • Uvnas-Moberg K.
        • Ekström-Bergström A.
        • Leahy-Warren P.
        • Karlsdottir S.I.
        • Nieuwenhuijze M.
        • et al.
        Birth as a neuro-psycho-social event: an integrative model of maternal experiences and their relation to neurohormonal events during childbirth.
        PLoS One. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230992
        • Uvnäs-Moberg K.
        • Ekström-Bergström A.
        • Berg M.
        • Buckley S.
        • Pajalic Z.
        • Hadjigeorgiou E.
        • et al.
        Maternal plasma levels of oxytocin during physiological childbirth - a systematic review with implications for uterine contractions and central actions of oxytocin.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2365-9
        • Walter M.H.
        • Abele H.
        • Plappert C.F.
        The role of oxytocin and the effect of stress during childbirth: neurobiological basics and implications for mother and child.
        Front. Endocrinol. 2021; 12: 1409
        • Green J.M.
        • Baston H.A.
        Have women become more willing to accept obstetric interventions and does this relate to mode of birth? Data from a prospective study.
        Birth. 2007; 34: 6-13
        • Lorentzen I.
        • Andersen C.S.
        • Jensen H.S.
        • Fogsgaard A.
        • Foureur M.
        • Lauszus
        • et al.
        Study protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the effect of a “birth environment room” versus a standard labour room on birth outcomes and the birth experience.
        Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100336
        • Unwin T.
        A waste of space? Towards a critique of the social production of space.
        Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 2000; 25: 11-29https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.2000.00011.x
        • Hammond A.
        • Foureur M.
        • Homer C.S.
        • Davis D.
        Space, place and the midwife: exploring the relationship between the birth environment, neurobiology and midwifery practice.
        Women Birth. 2013; 26: 277-281https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2013.09.001
        • Crowther S.
        • Smythe E.
        • Spence D.
        The joy at birth: an interpretive hermeneutic literature review.
        Midwifery. 2014; 30: e157-e165
        • Crowther S.
        • Smythe E.
        • Spence D.
        Kairos time at the moment of birth.
        Midwifery. 2020; 31: 451-457https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.11.005i
        • Reed-Danahay D.
        Bordieu and Social Space. Mobilities, Trajectories, Emplacements.
        Berghahn, New York2019
        • Hollander M.
        • Hastenberg E.
        • van Dillen J.
        • van Pamps M.
        • de Miranda E.
        • Stramrood C.
        Preventing traumatic childbirth experiences: 2192 women’s perceptions and views.
        Arch. Women’s Ment. Health. 2017; 20: 515-523
        • Van der Pijl M.
        • Hollander M.
        • van der Linden T.
        • Verweij R.
        • Holten L.
        • Kingma E.
        • et al.
        Left powerless: A qualitative social media content analysis of the Dutch #breakthesilence campaign on negative and traumatic experiences of labour and birth.
        PLoS One. 2020; 15e0233114
        • Wolf N.
        Misconceptions: Truth, Lies and the Unexpected on the Journey to Motherhood.
        Random House, New York city2002
        • Woliver L.R.
        The Political Geographies of Pregnancy.
        University of Illinois Press, Urbana2002
        • Koster D.
        • Romeijn C.
        • Sakko E.
        • Stam C.
        • Steenhuis N.
        • de Vries D.
        • et al.
        Traumatic childbirth experiences: practice-based implications for maternity care professionals from the woman’s perspective.
        Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12786
        • Grant D.
        • Michelson G.
        • Oswick C.
        • Wailes N.
        Guest editorial: discourse and organizational change.
        J. Organ. Change Manag. 2005; 18: 6-15
        • Cheng A.Y.N.
        Analysing complex policy change in Hong Kong: what role for discourse analysis?.
        Int. J. Educ. Manag. 2009; 23: 360-366
        • Holloway I.
        • Wheeler S.
        Additional approaches.
        in: Holloway I. Qualitative Research in Nursing. 2nd ed. Blackwell Science, Oxford2002
        • Tsoukas H.
        Afterword: why language matters in the analysis of organizational change.
        J. Organ. Change Manag. 2005; 18: 96-104
        • Sitz L.
        Beyond semiotics and hermeneutics: discourse analysis as a way to interpret consumers’ discourses and experiences.
        Qual. Mark. Res.: Int. J. 2008; 11: 177-191
        • Schneider K.P.
        • Barron A.
        Pragmatics of Discourse.
        De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin/Boston2014
        • Newburn M.
        • Singh D.
        Women’ Views about the Design and Facilities in Maternity Units: A National Survey.
        The National Childbirth Trust, Glasgow2003
        • Jenkinson B.
        • Josey N.
        • Kruske S.
        Birthspace: an Evidence-based Guide to Birth Environment Design. Queensland Centre for Mothers & Babies.
        The University of Queensland, 2014
        • Polit D.F.
        • Beck C.T.
        Essentials of Nursing Research Methods, Appraisal, and Utilization.
        Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA2006
        • Moser A.
        • Korstjen I.
        Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis.
        Eur. J. Gen. Pract. 2018; 24: 9-18
        • Downe S.
        • Finlayson K.
        • Oladapo O.T.
        • Bonet M.
        • Gülmezoglu A.M.
        What matters to women during childbirth: a systematic qualitative review.
        PLoS One. 2018; 13e0194906https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194906
        • Blume S.
        In search of experiential knowledge.
        Eur. J. Sci. Res. 2017; 30: 91-103
        • Fontein-Kuipers Y.
        • de Groot R.
        • van Staa A.
        Woman-centered care 2.0.: bringing the concept into focus.
        Eur. J. Midwifery. 2018; 2 (doi.org/10.18332/ejm/91492): 1-12
        • López-Toribio M.
        • Bravo P.
        • Llupià A.
        Exploring women’s experiences of participation in shared decision-making during childbirth: a qualitative study at a reference hospital in Spain.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04070-3
        • Liberati E.G.
        • Tarrant C.
        • Willars J.
        • Draycott T.
        • Winter C.
        • Chew S.
        • et al.
        How to be a very safe maternity unit: an ethnographic study.
        Soc. Sci. Med. 2019; 223: 64-72
        • Hunter B.
        Conflicting ideologies as a source of emotion work in midwifery.
        Midwifery. 2004; 20: 261-272
        • Hrešanová E.
        “Nobody in a maternity hospital really talks to you”: Socialist Legacies and Consumerism in Czech Women’s Birth Narratives.” Sociologický časopis/.
        Czech Sociol. Rev. 2014; 50: 961-986https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2014.50.6.150
        • Spendlove Z.
        Risk and boundary work in contemporary maternity care: Tensions and consequences.
        Health Risk Soc. 2018; 20: 63-80https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2017.1398820
        • Newnham E.C.
        Birth control: power/knowledge in the politics of birth.
        Health Sociol. Rev. 2014; 23: 254-268https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2014.11081978
        • Bohren M.A.
        • Vogel J.P.
        • Hunter E.C.
        • Lutsiv O.
        • Makh S.K.
        • Souza J.P.
        • et al.
        The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: a mixed-methods systematic review.
        PLoS Med. 2015; 12e1001847https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847
        • Wolf J.H.
        Risk and reputation: obstetricians, cesareans, and consent.
        J. Hist. Med. Allied Sci. 2018; 73: 7-28https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrx053
        • Elmir R.
        • Schmied V.
        • Wilkes L.
        • ackson D.
        Women’s perceptions and experiences of a traumatic birth: a meta-ethnography.
        J. Adv. Nurs. 2010; 66: 2142-2153
        • Descieux K.
        • Kavasseri K.
        • Scott K.
        • Parlier A.B.
        Why women choose home birth: a narrative review.
        J. Midwifery Women’s. Health. 2014; 59: 60-166
        • Goodyear-Smith F.
        • Buetow S.
        Power issues in the doctor-patient relationship.
        Health Care Anal. 2001; 9: 449-462https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013812802937
      1. ICM. Fear of raising concerns about care. ICM Research Report. A research report for the Care Quality Commission; April 2013 〈https://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/201304_fear_of_raising_complaints_icm_care_research_report_final.pdf〉.

        • Fenech G.
        • Thomson G.
        Defence against trauma: women’s use of defence mechanisms following childbirth-related trauma.
        J. Reprod. Infant Psychol. 2015; 33https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2015.1030731
        • Feeley C.
        • Burns E.
        • Adams E.
        • Thomson G.
        Why do some women choose to freebirth? A meta-thematic synthesis, part one.
        Evid. Based Midwifery. 2015; 13: 4-9
        • Kline W.
        Coming Home. How Midwives Changed Childbirth.
        Oxford University Press, Oxford2019
        • Nilsson C.
        • Wijk H.
        • Höglund L.
        • Hessman E.
        • Berg M.
        Effects of birthing room design on maternal and neonate outcomes: a systematic review.
        Health Environ. Res. Des. J. 2020; 13: 3
        • Johnson J.L.
        • Bottorff J.L.
        • Browne A.J.
        • Grewal S.
        • Hilton B.A.
        • Clarke H.
        Othering and being othered in the context of health care services.
        Health Commun. 2004; 16 (PMID: 15090288): 255-271https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327027HC1602_7
        • Thomson G.
        • Downe S.
        Widening the trauma discourse: the link between childbirth and experiences of abuse.
        J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008; 29https://doi.org/10.1080/01674820802545453
        • Wolf J.
        Deliver Me from Pain: Anesthesia and Birth in America.
        Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore2009
        • Michaels P.A.
        Childbirth and Trauma, 1940s-1980s.
        J. Hist. Med. Allied Sci. 2018; 73: 52-72https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrx054
        • Bohren M.
        • Vogel J.P.
        • Hunter E.C.
        • Lutsive O.
        • Makh S.K.
        • Souza J.P.
        • et al.
        The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: a mixed-methods systematic review.
        PLoS Med. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847