Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
- Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.Br. Med. J. 2011; 343 (243-17)https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7400
- Planned place of birth in New Zealand: does it affect mode of birth and intervention rates among low-risk women?.Birth. 2011; 38: 111-119https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00458.x
- Severe adverse maternal outcomes among low risk women with planned home versus hospital births in the Netherlands: nationwide cohort study.Br. Med. J. 2013; 346 (e1001184-f3263)https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f3263
- Outcomes associated with planned place of birth among women with low-risk pregnancies.Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2016; 188: e80-e90https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.150564
- Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth among women with low-risk pregnancies in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Midwifery. 2018; 62: 240-255https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.03.024
- Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth in Australia 2000 - 2012: a linked population data study.BMJ Open. 2019; 9: 1-12https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029192
- Maternal outcomes and birth interventions among women who begin labour intending to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital: a systematic review and meta-analyses.EClinicalMedicine. 2020; 21100319https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100319
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia's mothers and babies. 2021. Available from 〈https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/mothers-babies/australias-mothers-babies〉.
- Publicly-funded homebirth models in Australia.Women Birth. 2012; 25: 152-158https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2011.10.003
- The experiences of privately practising midwives in Australia who have been reported to the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency: a qualitative study.Women Birth. 2021; 34: e23-e31https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.07.008
Thiele B., Thorogood C. Community Based Midwifery Program in Fremantle WA. Fremantle: Centre for Research for Women (WA) and the Fremantle Community Midwives. 1997.
University of Technology Sydney. National publicly-funded homebirth consortium. 2021; Available at: 〈https://www.uts.edu.au/about/faculty-health/school-nursing-and-midwifery/centre-midwifery-child-and-family-health/research/past-projects/national-publicly-funded-homebirth〉. Accessed 8 December, 2021.
- Birthing outside the system: The motivation behind the choice to freebirth or have a homebirth with risk factors in Australia.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20: 254https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02944-6
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria for publicly-funded homebirth in Australia: a scoping review.Women Birth. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2021.01.009
- Why such differing stances? A review of position statements on home birth from professional colleges.BJOG. 2016; 123: 376-382https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13594
Australian College of Midwives. National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral. 4th ed.; 2021.
- Publicly funded homebirth in Australia: a review of maternal and neonatal outcomes over 6 years.Med. J. Aust. 2013; 198: 616-620https://doi.org/10.5694/mja12.11665
- Multiparous women’s confidence to have a publicly-funded homebirth: a qualitative study.Women Birth. 2011; 24: 122-128https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2010.09.001
- Seeing birth in a new light: the transformational effect of exposure to homebirth for hospital-based midwives.Midwifery. 2020; 88102755https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102755
- Women’s views and experiences of publicly-funded homebirth programs in Victoria, Australia: a cross-sectional survey.Women Birth. 2019; 32: 221-230https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.019
- Women’s perceptions of inclusion and exclusion criteria for publicly-funded homebirth — A survey.Women Birth. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2021.08.007
- Birthplace in Australia: processes and interactions during the intrapartum transfer of women from planned homebirth to hospital.Midwifery. 2018; 57: 18-25https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.10.022
- From hospital to home: Australian midwives’ experiences of transitioning into publicly-funded homebirth programs.Women Birth. 2017; 30: 70-76https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.08.001
- Publicly-funded home birth in Victoria, Australia: exploring the views and experiences of midwives and doctors.Midwifery. 2016; 35: 24-30https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.02.004
- Modelling the cost of place of birth: a pathway analysis.BMC Health Serv. Res. 2021; 21: 1-816https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06810-9
- What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited.Res. Nurs. Health. 2010; 33: 77-84https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20362
- Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research.Glob. Qual. Nurs. Res. 2017; 42333393617742282https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393617742282
- Reflexivity in midwifery research: The insider/outsider debate.Midwifery. 2012; 28: 52-60https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.10.018
- Reflexivity in qualitative research.J. Hum. Lact. 2019; 35: 220-222https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419830990
- The telephone medium and semi-structured interviews: a complementary fit.Qual. Res. Organ. Manag. 2011; 6: 265-277https://doi.org/10.1108/17465641111188420
- Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research?.Res. Nurs. Health. 2008; 31: 391-398https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20259
- In-depth Interviewing: Principles, Techniques, Analysis. 3rd ed. Pearson Australia Group, Australia2008
- What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers?.Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-being. 2014; 9: 26152https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.26152
- Why do women choose homebirth in Australia? A national survey.Women Birth. 2021; 34: 396-404https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.06.005
- Why do women choose an unregulated birth worker to birth at home in Australia: a qualitative study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17: 99https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1281-0
- Women's descriptions of childbirth trauma relating to care provider actions and interactions.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17: 21https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1197-0
- Regime change in Australian maternity hospitals.Soc. Theory Health. 2013; 11: 407-427https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2013.7
- Relationships: the hidden threads in the tapestry of maternity care.Midwifery. 2008; 24: 132-137https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2008.02.003
- Models of maternity care: evidence for midwifery continuity of care.Med J. Aust. 2016; 205: 370-374https://doi.org/10.5694/mja16.00844
- Central concepts in the midwife-woman relationship.Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2007; 21: 220-228https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00460.x
- What women value in the midwifery continuity of care model: a systematic review with meta-synthesis.Midwifery. 2018; 62: 220-229https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.04.011
- Experiences of women planning a home birth who require intrapartum transfer to hospital: a metasynthesis of the qualitative literature.Int. J. Childbirth. 2014; 4: 103-119https://doi.org/10.1891/2156-5218.104.22.168
World Health Organization, International Conference on Primary Health Care Declaration of Alma-Ata, 1978. Available at: 〈http://www.who.int/publications/almaata_declaration_en.pdf〉.
- Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care.Lancet. 2014; 384: 1129-1145https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3
- Homebirthing in the United Kingdom during COVID-19.Med. Law Int. 2020; 20: 183-200https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533220955224