Advertisement

The impact of a perineal care bundle on women’s birth experiences in Queensland, Australia: A qualitative thematic analysis

Published:September 12, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.09.002

      Abstract

      A care bundle was introduced into 28 Australian hospitals in 2018 with the aim of reducing severe perineal tears. There has been limited research regarding the impact of this bundle on women’s birth experiences.

      Question

      How does the introduction of a perineal care bundle impact on women’s birth experiences in Queensland maternity hospitals?

      Methods

      We recruited 18 women who had birthed in five Queensland hospitals where the bundle had been implemented. Semi-structured, individual interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

      Findings

      Three descriptive themes were generated: 1) Lack of information and consent to bundle elements, 2) Other non-consented and disrespectful treatment and 3) Recommendations for hospitals and clinicians. Two analytic themes were generated: 1) Default-position: Prioritising policies over women’s autonomy and 2) Counter-position: Women asserting their rights to autonomy and respect.

      Discussion

      None of the women interviewed could recall having received information about the perineal care bundle from clinicians during pregnancy. While many women accepted that its elements were in their or their baby’s best interests, this was not the case for all women. Some women reported coercive and non-consented application of bundle elements, which they found distressing.

      Conclusion

      Given the broader institutional context in which the perineal bundle was implemented, the impact on information provision, informed consent and the detrimental emotional consequences for some women arising from the bundle’s implementation were largely foreseeable. The potential for bundled care initiatives to impinge on women’s human rights to autonomy and respectful care should be given greater preventative attention prior to implementation.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, National Core Maternity Indicators 2017: Summary Report, AIWH, Canberra, 2021.

        • Gurol-Urganci I.
        • Bidwell P.
        • Sevdalis N.
        • et al.
        Impact of a quality improvement project to reduce the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a multicentre study with a stepped-wedge design.
        BJOG. 2021; 128: 584-592https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16396
        • Woolner A.M.
        • Ayansina D.
        • Black M.
        • Bhattacharya S.
        The impact of third- or fourth-degree perineal tears on the second pregnancy: a cohort study of 182,445 Scottish women.
        PLoS One. 2019; 14e0215180https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215180
        • Aasheim V.
        • Nilsen A.B.V.
        • Reinar L.M.
        • Lukasse M.
        Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma.
        Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017; 6CD006672https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006672.pub3
        • Bick D.
        • Hall J.
        • Keighley M.R.B.
        The impact of severe perineal trauma on a woman's relationship with her child: a hidden consequence.
        Midwifery. 2022; 108103323https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103323
      2. Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Evidence-Based Care Bundles, 2016. 〈http://www.ihi.org/Topics/Bundles/Pages/default.aspx〉, (Accessed 11 August 2022).

      3. Women’s Healthcare Australasia, WHA CEC Perineal Protection Bundle and How to Guide, 2022. 〈https://women.wcha.asn.au/collaborate/breakthrough-collaboratives/perineal-tears/〉, (Accessed 11 August 2022).

        • Allen J.
        • Small K.
        • Lee N.
        How a perineal care bundle impacts midwifery practice in Australian maternity hospitals: a critical, reflexive thematic analysis.
        Women Birth. 2022; 35: e1-e9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2021.01.012
        • Thornton J.G.
        • Dahlen H.G.
        The UK obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) care bundle: a critical review.
        Midwifery. 2020; 90102801https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102801
        • The Lancet
        Achieving respectful care for women and babies.
        Lancet. 2015; 385https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60701-2
        • Scamell M.
        • Thornton J.
        • Hales K.
        • et al.
        Impact of a quality improvement project to reduce the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a multicentre study with a stepped-wedge design: OASI care bundle.
        BJOG. 2022; 129: 174-175https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16885
      4. Rogers v Whitaker, HCA 58; (1992) 175 CLR 479 F.C. 92/045, 1992.

      5. Australian Capital Territory Government, Human Rights Act (ACT), 2004. 〈https://www.legislation.act.gov.au/View/a/2004-5/current/html/2004-5.html〉, (Accessed 11 August 2022).

      6. State of Victoria, The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act (Vic), 2006. 〈https://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/in-force/acts/charter-human-rights-and-responsibilities-act-2006/014〉, (Accessed 11 August 2022).

      7. State of Queensland, Human Rights Act (Qld), 2019. 〈https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/html/asmade/act-2019-005〉, (Accessed 11 August 2022).

        • Poulsen M.O.
        • Madsen M.L.
        • Skriver-Moller A.C.
        • Overgaard C.
        Does the Finnish intervention prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries? A systematic review of the literature.
        BMJ Open. 2015; 5e008346https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008346
        • Bidwell P.
        • Sevdalis N.
        • Silverton L.
        • et al.
        Women's experiences of the OASI Care Bundle; a package of care to reduce severe perineal trauma.
        Int. Urogynecol. J. 2021; 32: 1807-1816https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04653-2
        • Lee N.
        • Firmin M.
        • Gao Y.
        • Kildea S.
        Perineal injury associated with hands on/hands poised and directed/undirected pushing: a retrospective cross-sectional study of non-operative vaginal births, 2011-2016.
        Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2018; 83: 11-17https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.002
        • Dahlen H.G.
        • Priddis H.
        • Thornton C.
        Severe perineal trauma is rising, but let us not overreact.
        Midwifery. 2015; 31: 1-8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.09.004
        • Gupta J.K.
        • Sood A.
        • Hofmeyr G.J.
        • Vogel J.P.
        Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia.
        Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017; 5CD002006https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub4
        • Zaami S.
        • Stark M.
        • Beck R.
        • Malvasi A.
        • Marinelli E.
        Does episiotomy always equate to violence in obstetrics? Routine and selective episiotomy in obstetric practice and legal questions.
        Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019; 23: 1847-1854https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_201903_17219
        • Jardim D.M.B.
        • Modena C.M.
        Obstetric violence in the daily routine of care and its characteristics.
        Rev. Lat. Am. Enferm. 2018; 26e3069https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2450.3069
        • Braun V.
        • Clarke V.
        Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis.
        Qual. Res. Sport Exerc. Health. 2019; 11: 589-597https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2019.1628806
        • Braun V.
        • Clarke V.
        What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers?.
        Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-being. 2014; 9https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.26152
      8. State of Queensland, Queensland Perinatal Statistics 2019, Queensland Health, Brisbane, 2020.

      9. State of Queensland, Births by Hospital, Open Data Portal, 2019. 〈https://www.data.qld.gov.au/dataset/1013d0db-f38d-4dff-a3df-7f8078162b19/resource/d3d0feaa-8929-4cb6-9fd7-eb9f40f21bcb/download/bdm-births-by-hospital-2019.csv〉.

        • Palinkas L.A.
        • Horwitz S.M.
        • Green C.A.
        • Wisdom J.P.
        • Duan N.
        • Hoagwood K.
        Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research.
        Adm. Policy Ment. Health. 2015; 42: 533-544https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
        • Sim J.
        • Saunders B.
        • Waterfield J.
        • Kingstone T.
        Can sample size in qualitative research be determined a priori?.
        Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2018; 21: 619-634https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1454643
        • Braun V.
        • Clarke V.
        To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales.
        Qual. Res. Sport Exerc. Health. 2021; 13: 201-216https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2019.1704846
        • Schwandt T.A.
        The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry. third ed. SAGE Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA2007
        • Nowell L.S.
        • Norris J.M.
        • White D.E.
        • Moules N.J.
        Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria.
        Int. J. Qual. Methods. 2017; 16https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
        • Jenkinson B.
        • Kruske S.
        • Kildea S.
        The experiences of women, midwives and obstetricians when women decline recommended maternity care: a feminist thematic analysis.
        Midwifery. 2017; 52: 1-10https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.05.006
      10. C. Hirst, Rebirthing: Report of the Review of Maternity Services in Queensland, Queensland Department of Health, Brisbane, Queensland, 2005.

        • Keedle H.
        • Schmied V.
        • Burns E.
        • Dahlen H.G.
        From coercion to respectful care: women’s interactions with health care providers when planning a VBAC.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22: 70https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04407-6
        • McKinnon L.C.
        • Prosser S.J.
        • Miller Y.D.
        What women want: qualitative analysis of consumer evaluations of maternity care in Queensland, Australia.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 366https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-014-0366-2
      11. State of Queensland (Queensland Health), Rural Maternity Taskforce Report. 2019. 〈https://clinicalexcellence.qld.gov.au/priority-areas/patient-experience/maternity-service-improvement/rural-maternity〉, (Accessed 11 August 2022).

      12. World Health Organisation, Prevention and Elimination of Disrespect and Abuse during Facility-based Childbirth, 2014. 〈https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/134588/WHO_RHR_14.23_eng.pdf〉, (Accessed 11 August 2022).

      13. D. Simonovic, UN Human Rights Council Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women, UN Secretary General, A Human-rights Based Approach to Mistreatment and Violence Against Women in Reproductive Health Services with A Focus on Childbirth and Obstetric Violence, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women, its Causes and Consequences, United Nations, New York, NY, 2019.

      14. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Background Paper on the Role of the Judiciary in Addressing the Harmful Gender Stereotypes Related to Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights: A Review of the Case Law, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva, 2018.

        • Erdman J.N.
        Bioethics, human rights and childbirth.
        Health Hum. Rights. 2015; 17: 43-51https://doi.org/10.2307/healhumarigh.17.1.43
        • Perrotte V.
        • Chaudhary A.
        • Goodman A.
        “At least your baby is healthy” Obstetric violence or disrespect and abuse in childbirth occurrence worldwide: a literature review.
        Open J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020; 10: 1544-1562https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2020.10110139
        • Takehara K.
        • Noguchi M.
        • Shimane T.
        • Misago C.
        A longitudinal study of women's memories of their childbirth experiences at five years postpartum.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 221https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-221
        • Simkin P.
        Just another day in a woman’s life? Part II: Nature and consistency of women’s long‐term memories of their first birth experiences.
        Birth. 1992; 19: 64-81https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.1992.tb00382.x
        • Waldenstrom U.
        • Schytt E.
        A longitudinal study of women's memory of labour pain--from 2 months to 5 years after the birth.
        BJOG. 2009; 116: 577-583https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02020.x
        • Sperlich M.
        • Seng J.S.
        • Li Y.
        • Taylor J.
        • Bradbury-Jones C.
        Integrating trauma-informed care into maternity care practice: conceptual and practical issues.
        J. Midwifery Women’s Health. 2017; 62: 661-672https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12674
        • Fiscella K.
        • Tobin J.N.
        • Carroll J.K.
        • He H.
        • Ogedegbe G.
        Ethical oversight in quality improvement and quality improvement research: new approaches to promote a learning health care system.
        BMC Med. Ethics. 2015; 16: 63https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0056-2
        • Brolan C.E.
        Queensland's new Human Rights Act and the right to access health services.
        Med. J. Aust. 2020; https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50558