Continuity or team-teaching approach for midwifery education? An exploratory qualitative study of student and academic preferences

Published:November 03, 2022DOI:



      The content of midwifery courses is very similar across universities. The teaching approach is not, with universities adopting a variety of pedagogical methods.


      To explore views of midwifery students, midwifery academics and senior academic managers comparing a continuity approach where one main academic provides the majority of midwifery content plus pastoral care compared with a team-teaching approach of midwifery education where lecturers change throughout the course.


      Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were used to discover thoughts, benefits and disadvantages of two teaching approaches. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.


      Midwifery students and academics valued relationship building, consistency of advice and assessment expectations of the continuity approach but also appreciated a variety of teaching styles and content found in the team-teaching approach. Senior academic managers favoured a team-teaching approach due to workload concerns.


      Continuity and team-teaching pedagogical approaches offer different advantages. Continuity in midwifery education may provide students with a meaningful trusting relationship with their teacher and consistency of information, which could aid learning. A team-teaching approach provides students with diversity of teaching styles and midwifery ‘stories’. A combination of both pedagogies offering both a mix of teachers and a named ‘go-to’ mentor might help meet student requirements for both continuity and variety.


      Relationship building, consistency and trust, were all evident in the continuity approach whereas the team-teaching approach was considered to be a more sustainable workload model.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Browne J.
        • Taylor J.
        ‘It's a good thing…’: women's views on their continuity experiences with midwifery students from one Australian region.
        Midwifery. 2014; 30: e108-e114
        • Browne J.
        • Haora P.
        • Taylor J.
        • Davis D.
        "Continuity of care" experiences in midwifery education: perspectives from diverse stakeholders.
        Nurse Educ. Pract. 2014; 14: 573-578
        • Homer C.S.
        Models of maternity care: evidence for midwifery continuity of care.
        Med. J. Aust. 2016; 205: 370-374
        • Page L.
        Research on midwifery continuity of care shows many advantages.
        Br. J. Midwifery. 2013; 21: 690
        • Sandall J.
        • Soltani H.
        • Gates S.
        • Shennan A.
        • Devane D.
        Midwife‐led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.
        Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016;
        • Bradfield Z.
        • Hauck Y.
        • Kelly M.
        • Duggan R.
        "It's what midwifery is all about": Western Australian midwives' experiences of being "with woman' during labour and birth in the known midwife model.
        Bmc Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; 19
        • Fenwick J.
        • Sidebotham M.
        • Gamble J.
        • Creedy D.K.
        The emotional and professional wellbeing of Australian midwives: a comparison between those providing continuity of midwifery care and those not providing continuity.
        Women Birth. 2018; 31: 38-43
      1. ANMAC, Midwife Accreditation Standards 2014. Canberra: Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2014.

        • Gray J.
        • Leap N.
        • Sheehy A.
        • Homer C.S.E.
        Students' perceptions of the follow-through experience in 3 year bachelor of midwifery programmes in Australia.
        Midwifery. 2013; 29: 400-406
        • Dawson K.
        • Newton M.
        • Forster D.
        • McLachlan H.
        Exploring midwifery students' views and experiences of caseload midwifery: a cross-sectional survey conducted in Victoria, Australia.
        Midwifery. 2015; 31e7
        • Kuliukas L.
        • Bradfield Z.
        • Costins P.
        • et al.
        Midwifery students’: developing an understanding of being ‘with woman’––a qualitative study.
        Midwifery. 2020; 84
      2. R. Grigg, Becoming an outstanding primary school teacher/Russell Grigg. Harlow, England; New York: Harlow, England; New York: Longman, 2010.

        • Milic S.
        The development of a creative curriculum.
        Metod. Ogl. Method. Rev. 2007; 14: 67-82
        • Bakx A.
        • Koopman M.
        • de Kruijf J.
        • den Brok P.
        Primary school pupils' views of characteristics of good primary school teachers: an exploratory, open approach for investigating pupils' perceptions.
        Teach. Teach. 2015; 21: 543-564
        • Minett-Smith C.
        • Davis C.L.
        Widening the discourse on team-teaching in higher education.
        Teach. High. Educ. 2020; 25: 579-594
        • Money A.
        • Coughlan J.
        Team-taught versus individually taught undergraduate education: a qualitative study of student experiences and preferences.
        High. Educ. 2016; 72: 797-811
        • Kostko A.
        The impact of team teaching on student attitudes and classroom performance in introductory philosophy courses.
        Teach. Philos. 2019; 42: 329-354
        • Whitburn L.Y.
        • Colasante M.
        • McGowan H.
        • et al.
        Team-taught vs sole-taught anatomy practical classes: enhancing the student learning experience.
        J. Univ. Teach. Learn. Pract. 2021; 18
      3. J.W. Creswell, When should I choose a mixed methods approach? / [writer and] speaker, John W. Creswell. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2010.

        • Colorafi K.J.
        • Evans B.
        Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research.
        HERD. 2016; 9: 16-25
      4. V. Braun, V. Clarke, G. Terry, Thematic analysis, in: P. Rohleder AL (Ed.), Qualitative Research in Clinical and Health Psychology. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, 2014
        • Whitehead L.
        Qualitative data analysis.
        in: Jirojwong S. Johnson M. Welch A. Research Methods in Nursing and Midwifery: Pathways to Evidence-based Practice. Oxford University Press, Melbourne2014: 261-284
        • Dossett L.A.
        • Kaji A.H.
        • Cochran A.
        SRQR and COREQ reporting guidelines for qualitative studies.
        Arch. Surg. 2021; 156 (875-6)
        • Harley B.
        • Cornelissen J.
        Rigor with or without templates?: the pursuit of methodological rigor in qualitative research.
        Organ. Res. Methods. 2020; 25: 239-261
        • Nowell L.S.
        • Norris J.M.
        • White D.E.
        • Moules N.J.
        Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria.
        Int. J. Qual. Methods. 2017; 16
        • Lester J.N.
        • Evans K.R.
        Instructors' experiences of collaboratively teaching: building something bigger.
        Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ. 2008; 20: 373
        • Letterman M.
        • Dugan K.
        Team teaching a cross-disciplinary honors course: preparation and development.
        Coll. Teach. 2004; 52: 76-79
        • Benjamin Y.
        • Walsh D.
        • Taub N.
        A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes.
        Midwifery. 2001; 17: 234-240
        • Miller J.
        Where does the time go? An academic workload case study at an Australian university.
        J. High. Educ. Policy Manag. 2019; 41: 633-645
        • Kenny J.
        • Fluck A.
        Academic administration and service workloads in Australian universities.
        Aust. Univ. Rev. 2019; 61: 21-30
      5. B. Sanderson, M. Brewer, What do we know about student resilience in health professional education? A scoping review of the literature, 2017.

        • Cooper A.L.
        • Brown J.A.
        • Leslie G.D.
        Nurse resilience for clinical practice: an integrative review.
        J. Adv. Nurs. 2021; 77: 2623-2640
        • Cooper A.L.
        • Brown J.A.
        • Rees C.S.
        • Leslie G.D.
        Nurse resilience: a concept analysis.
        Int. J. Ment. Health Nurs. 2020; 29: 553-575
        • Earvolino-Ramirez M.
        Resilience: a concept analysis.
        Nurs. Forum. 2007; 42: 73-82
        • Stephens T.M.
        Nursing student resilience: a concept clarification.
        Nurs. Forum. 2013; 48: 125-133
        • Dugan K.
        • Letterman M.
        Student appraisals of collaborative teaching.
        Coll. Teach. 2008; 56: 11-15
        • Bloxham S.
        • Hughes C.
        • Adie L.
        What's the point of moderation? A discussion of the purposes achieved through contemporary moderation practices.
        Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2016; 41: 638-653
        • Beutel D.
        • Adie L.
        • Lloyd M.
        Assessment moderation in an Australian context: processes, practices, and challenges.
        Teach. High. Educ. 2017; 22: 1-14
        • Pachler D.
        • Kuonath A.
        • Frey D.
        How transformational lecturers promote students' engagement, creativity, and task performance: the mediating role of trust in lecturer and self-efficacy.
        Learn. Individ. Differ. 2019; 69: 162-172
        • Heilporn G.
        • Lakhal S.
        • Bélisle M.
        An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education.
        Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 2021; 18 (25-)
        • Fowler A.C.
        • Baker M.
        • Geraghty S.
        Is faculty practice valuable? The experience of Western Australian nursing and midwifery academics undertaking faculty clinical practice - a discussion paper.
        Nurse Educ. Pract. 2017; 26: 91-95
        • MacGregor D.
        • Smythe L.
        When the midwife-woman partnership breaks down: principles for ending the relationship.
        J. (N. Z. Coll. Midwives). 2014; 49: 9-14