Advertisement

Learning through relationships: The transformative learning experience of midwifery continuity of care for students: A qualitative study

Published:December 26, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.12.006

      Abstract

      Background

      Midwifery curricula in Australia incorporate ‘Continuity of care experiences’ (CoCE) as an educational strategy based on an assumption that midwifery students will learn skills and knowledge about woman-centred care that they may not learn in the typical fragmented care system. However, exactly what skills and knowledge they are expected to ‘learn’ and how these can be assessed have never been specifically identified.

      Aim

      To explore midwifery students’ continuity of care learning experiences within pre-registration midwifery education.

      Methods

      Focus groups were conducted with first, second and third year Bachelor of Midwifery students (n = 12), who were undertaking CoCE in rural and regional tertiary hospitals in NSW, Australia.

      Findings

      The overarching theme, ‘Learning through relationships’, was made up of three interrelated themes: Meeting women and making connections, Being known, and Understanding holistic care.

      Discussion

      The findings from this study contribute to understanding the educational effects of CoCE. The CoCE relationship provided safety and freedom to learn which was seen as foundational for midwifery students’ vision of their future practice and can be seen as a self-determined transformational approach to learning.

      Conclusion

      This study adds insight into midwifery students’ experience of CoCE, and demonstrates that transformative learning occurs through developing a relationship with both the woman and the midwife. For midwifery to develop as a profession and maintain its focus on woman-centredness, it is important that this aspect of midwifery education remains embedded within midwifery program philosophies and learning outcomes.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Women and Birth
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bradfield Z.
        • Duggan R.
        • Hauck Y.
        • Kelly M.
        Midwives being 'with woman': an integrative review.
        Women Birth. 2019; 31: 143-152
      1. International Confederation of Midwives. Global Standards for Midwifery Education (2010) Amended 2013; 2013.

        • Hainsworth N.
        • Dowse E.
        • Ebert L.
        • Foureur M.
        ‘Continuity of Care Experiences’ within pre-registration midwifery education programs: a scoping review.
        Women Birth. 2021; 34: 514-530
        • Bradford B.F.
        • Wilson A.N.
        • Portela A.
        • McConville F.
        • Fernandez Turienzo C.
        • Homer C.S.E.
        Midwifery continuity of care: a scoping review of where, how, by whom and for whom?.
        PLOS Glob. Public Health. 2022; 2
      2. Australian Nursing & Midwifery Accreditation Council (ANMAC). Midwife Accreditation Standards. Canberra; 2021.

        • Sandall J.
        • Soltani H.
        • Gates S.
        • Shennan A.
        • Devane D.
        Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.
        Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016;
        • Gray J.
        • Leap N.
        • Sheehy A.
        • Homer C.S.
        Students' perceptions of the follow-through experience in 3 year bachelor of midwifery programmes in Australia.
        Midwifery. 2013; 29: 400-406
        • Licqurish S.
        • Seibold C.
        'Chasing the numbers': Australian Bachelor of Midwifery students' experiences of achieving midwifery practice requirments for registration. Midwifery.
        . 2013; 29: 661-667
        • McKellar L.
        • Charlick S.
        • Warland J.
        • Birbeck D.
        Access, boundaries and confidence: The ABC of facilitating continuity of care experience in midwifery education.
        Women Birth. 2014; 27: e61-e66
      3. Australian Nursing and Midwifery Accreditation Council (ANMAC). Midwife Accreditation Standards 2014. Canberra; 2014.

        • Tierney O.
        • Sweet L.
        • Houston D.
        • et al.
        The continuity of care experience in Australian midwifery education-- What have we achieved?.
        Women Birth. 2017; 30: 200-205
        • Gamble J.
        • Sidebotham M.
        • Gilkison A.
        • Davis D.
        • Sweet L.
        Acknowledging the primacy of continuity of care experiences in midwifery education.
        Women Birth. 2019; 33
        • Moncrieff G.
        • MacVicar S.
        • Norris G.
        • Hollins Martin C.J.
        Optimising the continuity experiences of student midwives: an integrative review.
        Women Birth. 2021; 34: 77-86
        • Baird K.
        • Hastie C.
        • Stanton P.
        • Gamble J.
        Learning to be a midwife: midwifery students' experiences of an extended placement within a midwifery group practice.
        Women Birth. 2022; : 35
        • Sweet L.
        • Glover P.
        An exploration of midwifery continuity of care program at one Australian University as a symbiotic education model.
        Nurse Educ. Today. 2013; : 33
        • McLachlan H.L.
        • Newton M.
        • Nightingale H.
        • Morrow J.
        • Kruger G.
        Exploring the 'follow through experience': a statewide survey of midwifery students and academics conducted in Victoria, Australia.
        Midwifery. 2013; 29: 1064-1072
        • Hainsworth N.
        • Dowse E.
        • Cummins A.
        • Ebert L.
        • Foureur M.
        Heutagogy: a self-determined learning approach for Midwifery continuity of care experiences.
        Nurse Educ. Pr. 2022; 60103329
        • Blaschke L.M.
        • Hase S.
        Heutagogy: a holistic framework for creating 21st century self-determined learners.
        in: Gros B. Kinshuk M. The Future of Ubiquitous Learning: Learning Designs for Emerging Pedagogies. Spring Verlag, 2015: 25-40
        • Denzin N.
        • Lincoln Y.S.
        Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research.
        Thousand Oaks. fifth ed. Sage Publications, California2018: 1-25
        • King K.E.
        Method and methodology in feminist research: what is the difference?.
        J. Adv. Nurs. 1994; 20: 19-22
        • Crotty M.
        Critical Inquiry: Contemporary critics & contemporary critique.
        The Foundations of Social Research Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. Allen & Unwin, Australia1998: 139-159
        • Wilkinson S.
        Focus groups in feminist research: power, interaction, and co-construction of meaining.
        Women’s. Stud. Int Forum. 1998; 21: 1
        • Onwuegbuzie A.
        • Dickinson W.
        • Leech N A.Z.
        A qualiatative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research.
        Int J. Qual. Methods. 2009; 8: 3
        • Willis K.
        • Green J.M.
        • Daly D.
        • Williamson L.
        • Bandyopadhyay M.
        Perils and possibilities: achieving best evidence from focus groups in public health research.
        Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health. 2009; 33: 2
        • Bolderston A.
        Conducting a research interview.
        J. Med Imaging Radiat. Sci. 2012; 43: 66-76
        • Braun V.
        • Clarke V.
        Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis.
        Qual. Health Res. 2019;
        • Byrne D.
        A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis.
        Qual. Quant. 2022; 56: 1391-1412
      4. . Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia (NMBA). Midwife Standards for Practice. 2018.

        • McAra-Couper J.
        • Gilkison A.
        • Crowther S.
        • Hunter M.
        • Hotchin C.
        • Gunn J.
        Partnership and reciprocity with women sustain Lead Maternity Carer midwives in practice.
        N. Z. Coll. Midwives J. 2014; 49: 29-33
        • Deery R.
        • Hunter B.
        Emotional work and relationships in midwifery.
        in: Kirkham M. The Midwife-Mother Relationship. second ed. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke2010
        • Fontein- Kuipers Y.
        • de Groot R.
        • van Staa A.
        Woman-centered care 2.0: Bringing the concept into focus.
        Eur. J. Midwifery. 2018; 2
      5. Council of Australian Government (COAG) Health Council. Woman-centred care: Strategic directions for Australian maternity services. Canberra. Australia; 2019.

        • Bass J.
        • Sidebotham M.
        • Creedy D.
        • Sweet L.
        Midwifery students’ experiences and expectations of using a model of holistic reflection.
        Women Birth. 2020; 33: 383-392
        • Jefford E.
        • Nolan S.
        • Munn J.
        • Ebert L.
        What matters, what is valued and what is important in mentorship through the appreciative inquiry process of co-created knowledge.
        Nurse Educ. Today. 2021; 99104791
        • Catling C.
        • Rossiter C.
        • Cummins A.
        • McIntyre E.
        Midwifery workplace culture in Sydney, Australia.
        Women Birth. 2022; 35: e379-e388
        • Lennox S.
        • Jutel A.
        • Foureur M.
        The concerns of competent novices during a mentoring year.
        Nurs. Res. Pract. 2012; 2012812542
        • Carter A.G.
        • Wilkes E.
        • Gamble J.
        • Sidebotham M.
        • Creedy D.K.
        Midwifery students׳ experiences of an innovative clinical placement model embedded within midwifery continuity of care in Australia.
        Midwifery. 2015; 31: 765-771
        • Sidebotham M.
        • Fenwick J.
        Midwifery students' experiences of working within a midwifery caseload model.
        Midwifery. 2019; 74: 21-28
        • Griffiths M.
        • Fenwick J.
        • Gamble J.
        • Creedy D.K.
        Midwifery student evaluation of practice: the MidSTEP tool — perceptions of clinical learning experiences.
        Women Birth. 2020; 33: 440-447
        • Sidebotham M.
        • Baird K.
        • Walters C.
        • Gamble J.
        Preparing student midwives for professional practice: evaluation of a student e-portfolio assessment item.
        Nurse Educ. Pr. 2018; 32: 84-89
        • Yanti Y.
        • Claramita M.
        • Emilia O.
        • Hakimi M.
        Students' understanding of "Women-Centred Care Philosophy" in midwifery care through Continuity of Care (CoC) learning model: a quasi-experimental study.
        BMC Nurs. 2015; 14: 22
        • Carter A.G.
        • Creedy D.K.
        • Sidebotham M.
        Critical thinking in midwifery practice: a conceptual model.
        Nurse Educ. Pr. 2018; 33: 114-120
        • Bass J.
        • Fenwick J.
        • Sidebotham M.
        Development of a Model of Holistic Reflection to facilitate transformative learning in student midwives.
        Women Birth. 2017; 30: 227-235
        • Tickle N.
        • Gamble J.
        • Creedy D.K.
        Women’s reports of satisfaction and respect with continuity of care experiences by students: findings from a routine, online survey.
        Women Birth. 2021; 34: e592-e598
        • Davis D.
        • McIntosh C.
        Partnership in education: The involvement of service users in one midwifery programme in New Zealand.
        Nurse Educ. Pr. 2005; 5: 274-280
        • Cummins A.M.
        • Denney-Wilson E.
        • Homer C.S.
        The experiences of new graduate midwives working in midwifery continuity of care models in Australia.
        Midwifery. 2015; 31: 438-444
        • Hopkinson M.D.
        • Kearney L.
        • Gray M.
        • George K.
        New graduate midwives' transition to practice: a scoping review.
        Midwifery. 2022; 111103337
        • van der Waal R.
        • Mitchell V.
        • van Nistelrooij I.
        • Bozalek V.
        Obstetric violence within students’ rite of passage: the reproduction of the obstetric subject and its racialised (m)other.
        Agenda. 2021; 35: 36-53
      6. hooks b. Teaching to Transgress. Education as the Practice of Freedom. 1st ed. Great Britain: Taylor & Francis; 1994.

        • Freire P.
        Pedagogy of the Oppresssed.
        Hammondsworth. Penguin Books, 1972 (Revised edition ed)